Monday, September 1, 2025

New Temple Predictions - September 2025 Edition

I have updated my temple prediction map in preparation for General Conference in October. Several variables are used to identify prospective sites for future temple announcements. These include: the size of the Church in a given area (stakes, districts, wards, and branches), the age of the oldest stake, growth trends, distance to the nearest temple, traffic and transportation considerations, temple square footage, the historical number of weekly endowment sessions, and member/missionary reports on activity, temple attendance, and convert retention. Altogether, there are 186 potential temples on the map (which is 8 potential temple sites less than the total number of potential sites identified in March 2025, continuing a trend for many years of temple growth outpacing other growth metrics for the Church). The following five locations have been added to the temples prediction map with this current update - all of which are less likely temples:

  • Cheyenne, Wyoming
  • Eldoret, Kenya
  • Fort Myers, Florida
  • Greensboro, North Carolina
  • Providence, Rhode Island

Also, there were two locations that were moved from the less likely to be announced list to the more likely to be announced list. Provided with a reasoning for the transfer from the less likely temples to be announced list to the more likely temples to be announced list, these locations include: 

  • Augusta, Maine (remote location, third stake recently organized in Maine, no temple in the United States in the Northeast north of Boston, Massachusetts)
  • Kinshasa DR Congo Kimbanseke (Kinshasa is now the metropolitan area with the most stakes of any city on the Afro-Eurasian landmass with 17, and several more stakes appear likely to be organized in the immediate future; rapid growth, high rates of member activity and convert retention, difficulty traveling to the current temple from far eastern areas of the metropolitan area)
  • Tema, Ghana (12 stakes in the immediate Accra, Ghana and Tema, Ghana area, with four more stakes on the outskirts of the city; a couple stakes likely to divide in the near future; moderate growth in the city during the past two decades; improving accessibility to the temple for stakes in the northeast area of the metropolitan area)
  • Yopougon, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire (Abidjan is the metropolitan city on the Afro-Eurasian landmass with the second most stakes (16) with a couple additional stakes likely to be organized soon; high rates of growth in the past decade; high Latter-day Saint density in the city population in the Yopougon area)

For the first time, I am providing my top 20 most likely locations for a temple announcement this October. With 15–20 temples announced in nearly every General Conference for several years, expanding the prediction list feels appropriate. I welcome your own prediction lists and insights in the comments. However, I anticipate that this period of rapid temple expansion will eventually wind down, as the overall growth of the Church has not kept pace with the rate of temple announcements.

  1. Angeles or Olongapo, Philippines 
  2. Bo, Sierra Leone
  3. Port Harcourt, Nigeria
  4. Rigby, Idaho
  5. Lomé, Togo 
  6. Southeast Salt Lake City, Utah (i.e., Cottonwood Heights, Holladay, or Sandy)
  7. Evanston, Wyoming
  8. San Pablo City, Philippines
  9. Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
  10. Ibadan, Nigeria
  11. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 
  12. Lilongwe, Malawi
  13. Santa Maria, Brazil
  14. Augusta, Maine
  15. Kimbanseke, Kinshasa, DR Congo
  16. Tema, Ghana
  17. Yopougon, Côte d’Ivoire
  18. San Luis Valley, Colorado
  19. Longview, Texas
  20. Lahore, Pakistan

 

286 comments:

1 – 200 of 286   Newer›   Newest»
Matt said...

Here is a list of 31 locations that may appear on the 'less likely to be announced' list in the coming years—likely 3–7 years out—based on the same criteria outlined at the beginning of this post. Much of this will depend on the creation of additional stakes, and in some areas, new stake creation does not appear imminent:

Albany, New York

Aparri, Philippines

Atlanta, Georgia (second temple)

Belmopan, Belize

Berlin, Germany

Bilbao, Spain

Bozeman, Montana

Bujumbura, Burundi

Dumaguete, Philippines

Fargo, North Dakota

Gboko, Nigeria

Georgetown, Guyana

Gillette, Wyoming

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Kalibo, Philippines

Kisangani, DR Congo

Lenexa, Kansas

Legazpi, Philippines

Lyon, France

Minj, Papua New Guinea

Ngandajika, DR Congo

Pointe-Noire, Republic of the Congo

Salem, Oregon

San Marcos, Guatemala

San Miguel, El Salvador

Seville, Spain

Tanna, Vanuatu

Whangarei, New Zealand

Yaoundé, Cameroon

Yerevan, Armenia

James G. Stokes said...

Hey, Matt! Glad to see your lists in this post and in your above comment. As mentioned in the threads of the previous post, those who are interested in my projections can see this document, which outlines all prospects I see in the near term, and this one, which is an area-by-area breakdown of temples announced by President Nelson in each General Conference.

As I have previously noted in various other threads on my blog and here on this blog, with 382 current temples, I am projecting that exactly 18 more will be announced in October, bringing the worldwide total to an even 400. I have also heard statements attributed to various general leaders indicating that President Nelson's goal is to have 500 in any phase by the 200th anniversary of the Church's reestablishment (Satureday, April 6, 2030).

So I'm glad to see your expanded lists, Matt, and I hope that my lists, such as they are, are helpful to all who view them. Thanks for another great report, Matt! Keep up the great work!

James G. Stokes said...

I forgot to add that, on the area-by-area document, my more specific picks for October can be found at the bottom. Hope that further contextualizes my predictions.

jonesto942@gmail.com said...

Strong candidates for temples Oct 2025

Herriman or E. SLC UT
Fort Bridger or Evanston WY
Poza Rica Mexico
Machala Ecuador
Quevedo Ecuador
Santiago Chile
Neuquen Argentina
Buenos Aires Argentina
Santa Maria or Passo Fundo Brazil
Sao Paulo Brazil
Bo Sierra Leone
Yamoussoukro Ivory Coast
Port Harcourt or Ibadan Nigeria
Kinshasa DRC
in or near Angeles Philippines

Potential Surprises:
Paducah KY
Longview TX or Shreveport LA
Mobile AL
Newnan GA
Augusta ME
Puerto La Cruz Venezuela

John Pack Lambert said...

I will report my previous predictions here.

I have decided to put together my list of new temples for October 2025. I feel I am still a little early, but I might not be able to have another time to compile the list.

I suspect there will be 18 announced, taking us to an even 400. I would love to see more, but that is what I expect.

Here is my list of 18 in no particular order:
Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Lome, Togo
Bo, Sierra Leone
Kinshasa DR Congo 2 (probably close to the airport)
Toulouse, France
Prague, Czech Republic
Sendai, Japan
Angeles, Philippines
Resitencia, Argentina
Otavalo, Ecuador
Sorocaba, Brazil
Antigua, Guatemala
Poza Rica, Mexico
Henderson, Nevada
Thousand Oaks, California
2nd Weber County, Utah
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Somewhere in New Hampshire

3 next top candidates:
4th Dallas Metro Temple
Waco Texas Temple
Augusta Maine Temple

Really high candidates I could not fit on the list above:
Appleton Wisconsin Temple
Santa Maria, Brazil
Xalapa, Mexico
Hobart, Australia
Olongopo, Philippines
Legazpi City, Philippines
Yamosoukro, Ivory Coast
Cotonou, Benin
Somewhere in eastern North Carolina
Little Rock, Arkansas
Charleston, South Carolina
Charleston, West Virginia
Ciudad Obregon, Mexico
Mexicali, Mexico

Temples that I think less likely:
Canberra, Australia
Ottawa, Canada
Olympia, Washington
Eastern Oregon
Salem, Oregon
San Francisco, California
Santa Rosa, California
San Luis Obispo, California
Chinle, Arizona
Surprise, Arizona
Provo Temple #3
Provo Temple #4
Rigby, Idaho
America Falls, Idaho
Preston, Idaho
Morgan, Utah
Park City, Utah
Murray/Sandy/Holliday, Utah
West Valley City, Utah
Harriman, Utah
Springville, Utah
Gunnison, Utah
Delta, Utah
Satanquin, Utah
Alpine, Utah
Roosevelt, Utah
San Luis Valley, Colorado
Topeka, Kansas
2nd Temple for metro Kansas City
Columbus Georgia Temple
Gainesville, Florida Temple
Appleton Wisconsin Temple
Long Island New York Temple
Harrison/White Plaines New York Temple
Utica/Albany New York Temple
Fortaleza Temple 2
Abijan Temple 2
Benin City Temple 2
London England Hyde Park Temple
Tempe Arizona Temple
Champaign Illinois Temple
Paducah Kentucky Temple
Lafayette Indiana Temple
Midland Michigan Temple
Munich Germany Temple
Leeds England Temple
Bristol England Temple
Gotteborg Sweden Temple
Valencia Venezuela Temple
Kingston Jamaica Temple
Port-of-Spain Trinidad and Tobago Temple
Greensboro North Carolina Temple
Dayton Ohio Temple
Bloomington Indiana Temple
Lincoln Nebraska Temple
Iowa City Iowa Temple
Luputa DR Congo Temple
Kolwezi DR Congo Temple
2nd Papua New Guinea Temple
Haapai Islands Tonga Trmple
2nd Nukualofa Tonga Temple
4th greater Manila Philippines Temple
4th greater Lima Peru Temple
3rd Sao Paulo Brazil Temple

Anonymous said...

I’m surprised Pakistan is on the list, there aren’t any stakes there!

Anonymous said...

There is already a temple in Santiago!

Thomas Wagner said...

I made a map that shows my predictions for this General Conference’s temple announcements. Black dots are existing/under construction/announced temples, red locations are locations I think are very likely to be announced, blue are locations I think are somewhat likely to be announced, and green are less likely to be announced.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1AmwcgvPYngdfL6mShZ8Q_m4XyduHivE&ll=10.397520911816653%2C-11.041823980756174&z=2

Gary Stroble said...

You listed Appleton Wisconsin as both a really high candidate and as less likely. Frankly, until the location of the Milwaukee Wisconsin Temple is disclosed, that is very unlikely.

James G. Stokes said...

Also, I further anticipate 6 US temples and 12 elsewhere in the world.

Rocky said...

Thanks for sharing your temple predictions. It's always exciting to hear about the new temples each General Conference. In July there was an article by the Church about the number of temples in the Pacific Area (currently 11) going to double with the announcements of the Noumea Caledonia and Liverpool Australia temples.
https://news-pacific.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/why-is-the-church-doubling-its-number-of-temples-in-the-south-pacific
Curious to see if the Pacific Area will get anymore temples announced in October.

Rocky said...

This article was from mid-August but was highlighted last Sunday in my inbox. I recall hearing about this earlier in the year and this article talks about that it's not the Church bur rather affiliated companies buying farming land. I'm not familiar with Farmland Reserve and Alkira Farms if someone could shed light on what the relationship is between the Church and these companies?
https://news-au.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/does-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints-own-farms-in-australia

miro said...

I think the most likely temples in europe will be Bristol England (or Cardif Wales), Southern Spain (Seville, Murcia or Valencia or two of those) and Southern France (Lyon (mission home) or Toulouse (more central for Soutern Fench stakes)).

Pascal Friedmann said...

I agree and would add Tirana to that list.

James G. Stokes said...

There is also already a temple in Buenos Aires, but I think they were referring to President Nelson's earlier statement that multiple temples will be built in some selected major metropolitan areas. We've seen him do that in Mexico City, Santiago Chile, Sao Paulo Brazil, and Buenos Aires so far, but there may be others needed in those areas. That's what I believe they meant.

Bryansb1984 said...

I'm going to add
Thousand Oaks, California
Lancaster, California
Henderson, Nevada
Mesquite, Nevada
Tremonton, Utah
North Ogden, Utah
Shreveport, Louisiana
Alexandria, Virginia
Mesa Arizona East

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
anonymous said...

For Reference September 2, 2025:

Temples Total - 382
Dedicated - 208
Temples Under Construction - 60
Temples Announced - 114

I think 500 temples announced on or by the April 2030 General Conference is too low an estimate. Assume 18 temples are announced in the October 2025 General Conference, bringing the total to 400. That would mean 100 more temples announced over the next nine General Conferences, amounting to an average of 11.1 temple announcements per General Conference.

I believe that estimate is too low.

600 Total? 400 Dedicated? Under current cycletimes, would these estimates be too high?

What is the average number of temples announced, under construction, and dedicated each of the last three years? I don't know, but I know some of you do.

I am totally curious to see how many temples are dedicated in 2026.

anonymous said...

I felt I had my Top 20 predictions locked in about four weeks ago and saved my document. Then I started reading some of the other predictions this morning, and I made a few last-minute changes. I didn’t have Albany, NY, and Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, on any list before. Both of those locations are strong dark horses (in my opinion), but they did not crack my Top 20.

I look forward to seeing all the other predictions.

My Top 20:

1. Bo, Sierra Leone
2. Sandy, UT
3. Temecula, CA
4. Henderson, NV
5. San Luis Valley, CO
6. Blackfoot, ID
7. Angeles, Philippines
8. Surprise, AZ
9. Pensacola, FL
10. Hobart, Australia
11. Cotonou, Benin
12. Jackson, MS
13. Redding, CA
14. Cardiff, Wales
15. Augusta, ME
16. Hurricane, UT
17. Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
18. Kanab, UT
19. Gilmer, TX
20. Prescott Valley, AZ

anonymous said...

In 2025, nine temples will be dedicated.

Below is that list with the elapsed time from announcement to dedication (roughly):

Aukland New Zealand Temple - 6.5 years
(Oct 2018 – April 2025)

Nairobi Kenya Temple – 8 years
(April 2017 – May 2025)

Abidjan Ivory Coast Temple – 10 years
(April 2015 – May 2025)

Syracuse Utah Temple - 5 years
(April 2020 – June 2025)

Antofagasta Chile Temple – 6 years
(April 2019 – June 2025)

Farmington New Mexico Temple – 4.25 years
(April 2021 – August 2025)

Elko Nevada Temple – 4.5 years
(April 2021 – October 2025)

Grand Junction Colorado Temple - 4.5 years
(April 2021 – October 2025)

Bahia Blanca Argentina Temple – 5.5 years
(April 2020 – November 2025)


In theory, several temples announced in October 2025 could be dedicated and operational by the April 2030 General Conference.

Nephi said...

I lived in Mesquite NV for 15 years. I just dont see a temple happening. The Spanish Branch has maybe 10 people attending sacrament. Both Stakes are small and a former Stake President jammed a new stake through. Probably half the wards in the 2 stakes are very small and probably shouldn't exist. This is what happens when people are gunning to be an Area Authority

Caleb said...

I am confused by why the Southeast Salt Lake Valley (Sandy, Holladay, or Cottonwood Heights) seems like such a need. We already have a Southeast Salt Lake Valley Temple (Draper) and every growth metric of the church is probably declining in that area. Once the Salt Lake Temple gets back, they will absolutely need all the Holladay/Cottonwood Heights Stakes to staff it, as it is enormous. Combine that with the also enormous Jordan River Temple, where most Sandy stakes attend, and I can't imagine the need for another temple in the area. I am a resident of one of the aforementioned cities in the area.

John Pack Lambert said...

I would replace the lower down one with Fort Myers, Florida.

John Pack Lambert said...

If we allow for announcements through the end of 2030 we have 10 more conference after this one. That would be 20 per conference to get 600 temples announced by the end of 2030 if we get 18 announced in October. A quicker pace, but not super quicker.

To get 400 dedicated temples by 2030 we need everything announced by the end of this year dedicated by then (including whatever is announced in October) or some to get done is less than 5 years. That is doable. I mean in 1995 predicting hitting 100 temples by 20000 would have seemed undoable.

One other goal, having 500 temples in operation by the end of 2030 would seem very hard to achieve. It would be doable if we could get temple from announcement to operation in under 2 years like they did in the late 1990s, but I am not sure there is any way to really do things at that speed.

Chris D. said...

FYI, the new Young Men President recently had a devotional in Oaxaca, Mexico. Where there is already a dedicated temple. The only other locations on Matts above map closest would be either Acapulco or Coatzacalcos Mexico, but both a considerable distance. I'm not sure if Oaxaca would warrant a 2nd temple yet. At least not on Matt's radar.

https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders/2025/09/02/timothy-farnes-first-international-ministry-oaxaca-mexico/

Chris D. said...

Also, recently a group of about 100 members in Lithuania made a trip to the Helsinki Finland Temple.

https://www.thechurchnews.com/members/2025/09/01/vilnius-lithuania-district-long-journey-helsinki-finland-temple/

Chris D. said...

Tarlac Philippines South Stake (2302365)
(Organized 24 August 2025)
- Capas Ward (191493)
- Concepcion Ward (146633)
- Dap-Dap Branch (2035014)
- Lapaz Ward (341363)
- Tarlac 5th Ward (228419)

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/2302365

Ohhappydane33 said...

Probably because everyone just assumes that since the west side of the valley is getting all these new temples that the east side of the valley should get a corresponding number of new temples as well.

Anonymous said...

I,m surprised you didn’t predict more temples in Utah!

Chris D. said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
James G. Stokes said...

For the record, the 500 temple minimum was the specifically-mentioned number for that date according to the statements from several general Church leaders. It wasn't a personal projection. Here's the thing: 15 has been the magic number for announced temples the last several April General Conferences, with the number of temples each October being more variable, but always below 20. So if that trend continues, it will take longer to get to 500 in any phase than you estimated, Anonymous. The odds are very good that subsequent statements from general Church leaders may put that figure higher, but for now, that's the information I'm going off of.

Based on the current slower pace of finishing temples and getting open houses and dedications scheduled of late, some of the temples that had groundbreakings this year (but have not yet had construction begin) may only be dedicated in 2029 or 2030, at earliest. That particularly goes for the Heber Valley Utah Temple, which had a groundbreaking almost 3 years ago but has only recently had construction of any kind begin. And the resident's group has petitioned the Supreme Court to stop the construction pending the decision of that court on the citizen group's attempted legal action to stop that construction altogether.

Further, the last temple groundbreaking was held on August 23 (for 3 temples) and the next groundbreaking isn't scheduled to occur until the end of this month. Barring an announcement within the next week or two, we are unlikely to see any other groundbreakings occur until October at earliest. And the Church has full-scale construction pending for 10 temples currently.

So the reality is slightly starker than the suggestions you laid out. The reality is that there are very real supply chain issues or red tape slowing temple construction processes from proceeding as swiftly as was hoped. Is it faster than it has been in the past? in some ways, yes. But in other, very real ways, with real world factors in play, again, the earliest most temples that had groundbreakings occur this year could be dedicated is 2028 or 2029, and that's assuming that there are no delays for any of them once construction begins.

I would love it if I am underestimating things, or overstating the obstacles. But I don't think I am. Unless construction can keep pace with announcements, which are actually totaling less than 35 temples each year, the pacing of announcements will be slower, as will the construction of some temples. The Bengaluru India Temple, as another example, has had construction halted altogether until the Church can surmount financial obstacles.

So if 15 continues to be the number announced each April, and less than 20 each October, getting to the numbers you're suggesting will take far longer than 2030. I could see 500 by 2030 at the current pace, but as of today, it's looking less likely than I thought that the Church will actually get to 300 temples by the 200th anniversary of the Church's reestablishment. I'm still hoping that might happen, but the Church would have to dedicate over 20 per year between now and then, and based on what I'm seeing with dedication scheduling, it may not happen like I hope it will.

Of course, if dedications, groundbreakings, and continued temple construction announcements are made every week going forward, it might be a different story. But if you look at the actual numbers and the lengths of time passing between a temple's completion and its' subsequent announcement of opening arrangements, unless that picks up, and groundbreakings and full-scale construction pcks up, I just don't see that happening. I hope the Lord proves me wrong, but for now, I don't think I'm that off. Sorry for the sermon, but you did ask.

L. Chris Jones said...

With some temples going for small districts what about a temple in central Idaho such as Moore. It can be taken three stakes (Moore, Salmon, and Carey). It can cut some travel especially in the winter. I also see Blackfoot and Rigby in the next few years. Eventually a second temple in Bonneville county such as Ammon. I think Kanab Utah and Tremonton Utah as well as somewhere in the East side of the SLC valley, and maybe Springville Utah. More temples in Nigeria such as Port Harcourt. As well as the southern Spain, and The Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia. And Davenport or Hobart on the island of Tasmania, Australia. And South Island to New Zealand such as in Christchurch. The countries of Togo and/or Benin. Next US State to get its first temple would probably be Maine or maybe New Hampshire.

L. Chris Jones said...

I also wonder what the metric was for the need of a second temple in Rexburg is. The new Teton River Temple is going to be one of the largest built in a couple of decades and The Rexburg Temple is just a few miles down the same street. From a layman's perspective I don't currently understand the need for another temple, especially a larger one based on the number of stakes unless they're expecting a lot of growth or a significant increase in temple attendance. I say this even if they decided to move the Rigby stakes from Idaho Falls to Rexburg. And I don't think that'll make any difference in whether a Rigby temple is built or not. But The Lord and the prophets and apostles have a greater understanding of is needed and I am excited for that.

James G. Stokes said...

Anything's possible in theory, but in practice is a different thing altogether. We have a number of temples announced within the last 3 years or longer ago that still lack any site announcement, let alone an exterior rendering or groundbreaking And, as I noted above, some temples that most recently had either a groundbreaking or full-scale construction begin in the last year may only be dedicated in 2028 or 2029 at earliest. That's based on my analysis of the time that also elapses between when major construction is fully completed and when dedications are announced vs. when they take place. Lindon's had major construction wrapped up for a while now, and has not yet had a dedication announcement. I had longtime hopes it would be dedicated this year, but it might only happen in April of next year at earliest. For some reason, temples have been sitting empty for months lately before their finishing touches are added and dedications are scheduled That's likely due to supply chain issues. Until that changes and/or the length of time between a temple's completion and its subsequent dedication announcement is reduced, it's a slower pace, especially for temples outside the US.

L. Chris Jones said...

I wonder what the potential is for temples and cities that begin with x or z. For Temple names we already have the rest of the alphabet covered. Would places like Xalpa, or Zacatexas or Zamora Mexico be potential temples? Or Zamboanga Philippines. Zapala or Zarate Argentina? .

Anonymous said...

Because the Rexburg is constantly booked for appointments and very difficult to get in. So another temple is needed to keep up with the demand.

anonymous said...

James,

I'm the commenter above (RT). I totally agree with you. Announcements are the easiest part of the temple construction process. Land purchases, temple design (exterior, interior, and systems), entitlement processes within jurisdictions (sometimes multiple), contracts, utilities, engineering and building contractors, materials, skilled craftsmen, weather, temple size all are factors in temple construction.

As you also mentioned, the Church has its own processes and timelines for finalizing the temple, including furniture, artwork, and other finishes, before the open house. I know very little about these processes, but it appears there are limitations and constraints there, too.

I also know there is great variability across geographic regions. I recognize that some temple locations move through these processes very quickly, while others do not. I would assume that a temple in Queen Creek, Arizona, will be completed in a much shorter time span than the temple in Antananarivo, Madagascar, no matter the difference in size.

I consider you and JPL the geography and number-crunching experts on this site. I know we also have some very strong map and data contributors. (I enjoy everyone's contributions and ideas) Here are some more questions I have regarding growth and efficiency in those processes.

What is the time from the 200th temple announcement to the 200th temple dedicated?

250th?

300th?

Are these elapsed times decreasing? I don't know?

Can the Church dedicate 24 temples in 2026 or 2027? Rick's temple website used to have completion estimates, but I don't know without those.

Is trying to dedicate 30 - 36 temples a year just too many for the current processes?

Thanks, everyone.

Matt Reynolds said...

Hey Everyone - I've loved this blog for years. Can I selfishly promote my book - Finding Zion: The Top U.S. Cities for Latter-day Saint Living. You can purchase on Amazon.

In this book I guide readers through a state-by-state look at the most spiritually and practically supportive places for Latter-day Saints to live. Drawing on Church history, prophetic counsel, and real-world data, I offer both rankings and reflections to help you make one of life’s most important decisions with clarity and faith.

Search for it on Amazon

Pascal Friedmann said...

Different topic: The Church just organized an official group in Nunavut: https://www.facebook.com/MontrealQuebecMountRoyalStake/posts/pfbid02DaAXmsiKs88dJregK44vyYbeXXSYMrcYGy1R4JFoHQoAezM4r2g2m612EFmS1TjDl

James G. Stokes said...

Hello, anonymous. Happy to offer my additional thoughts and analysis. My records show that the 200th temple of the Church was announced during the October 2018 General Conference. The 12 announced at that time actually gave us 201 in total. The October 2018 General Conference was held on October 6-7, 2018. The 200th operating temple was the Deseret Peak Utah Temple, dedicated on November10 of last year. Thus, it took the Church approximately 6 years and 1 month to go from slightly more than 200 temples announced to having 200 temples dedicated.

Given the randomization of the numbers of temples announced in each General Conference (with the pattern of 15 announced every April being pretty solid, while the number announced in October has been more variable), it gets harder from there to pinpoint when the 250th and 300th temples were announced. I have searched my files for that information and have not yet found it. That's generally because the temples are announced in sets.

But I can tell you that, based on my current estimates, the Church may only get to 250 dedicated temples by September 2028, at earliest, unless something changes. So getting the 300 dedicated by the 200th anniversary of the Church's restoration & reestablishment may not be possible, unless construction accelerates along with the timespan between when a temple is completed and when its subsequent dedication is set to occur.

Could that be the case in the future? If supply chain issues resolve, then, certainly so. But we were lucky to get 8 temple dedications this year, and next year, there may only be 14 temples dedicated, according to my projections, which have been overly optimistic lately in comparison with what's actually happening. And in 2027, I'm currently estimating 14 as well. So unless we go back to the Hinckley-era practice of all smaller temples that can be quickly approved and swiftly built and promptly dedicated, 30-36 temples per year doesn't seem realistic with the existing delays.

That's what I've been able to conclude on these questions thus far. Thanks, anonymous.

James G. Stokes said...

Just found some more information after further scouring my files and online. The Church's 250th temple was announced in April 2021. And, as I noted, my current projections (which make allowances for potential delays like we've been seeing) my estimates show that the Church may only get to the 250th dedicated temple milestone sometime in 2028. Meanwhile, the 300th announced temple was announced in the October 2022 General Conference, and, if my current projections are anywhere near correct (my dedication estimates usually are not) , then the Church, as noted, may only get to 250 dedicated temples sometime in 2028.

So unless something changes, or unless most of the most recently announced temples are smaller in nature (which has also not been the trend of late), then I could maybe see the 300th temple dedicated sometime in 2032, but that's assuming the length of time between the completion of temple construction and the subsequent dedication dates is cut short, which it hasn't been.

Even so, we are in unprecedented territory for temple construction, so that's something at least.

Thomas Jay Kemp said...

Team: What are your suggestions for the best location for a multi-week stay in a full-service Marriott hotel (actual hotel, not an extended stay brand) that is directly adjacent to a Temple (less than a mile) — where that Temple is open all day, 5 days a week—in a temperate climate with no snow and no extreme heat? (So, not SLC etc.) The goal would be to live at the hotel and easily attend the Temple daily.


John Pack Lambert said...

Oaxaca state is also getting a 2nd temple in Juchitan de Zaragoza. I think Poza Rica is the most likely next temple in Mexico, but I have thought that for at least the last two conference as well when we got Juchitan de Zaragoza and then Reynosa announced, so I am not a good predictor.

Scott said...

I think Hyrum Utah makes a lot of sense for a new temple even though it isn't even listed as a less likely candidate. There could be 10-15 stakes assigned to it and it is spaced about as far from the Logan Utah Temple as the Syracuse Utah Temple is from the Layton Utah Temple. The Logan Utah Temple is a very busy temple and will likely still be once the Smithfield Utah Temple is completed. This would also give more flexibility with a Logan Utah Temple remodel.

Downtownchrisbrown said...

That's really cool. I was surprised to note that I know the Group leader. Small world

Spencer said...

There haven’t been very many site announcements of temples this year. Will that change? Russia, China and Uab, will we ever hear about those temples? Russia has freedom of religion but strict with missionary work there rules right now.

Uab invited the church to build there temple. No missionary work right now but members can worship there with no problem. Just can’t do missionary work.

China though you can attend church, can’t proselyte. Use scriptures and magazines for personal use. When the building is announced, government will approve it, but have to be discreet. Do they make people worship on zoom for the time being there now? You will have to get appointment for temple work when it is built, for Chimes natives only. That could change in the future when China opens its doors. Will happen we go in front door too.

James G. Stokes said...

Yet. But that doesn't mean there won't ever be. And the Church has sometimes announced temples in areas with no stakes at the time of the temple announcement that are actually created not long after a temple is announced. I also have Pakistan on my list.

James G. Stokes said...

Many of those that had site announcements last year are now in the construction queue, which is why it looks like there aren't very many 2024 site announcements in 2024. The following page tells the real story:

https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/temple-news-house-of-the-lord-2024

See also the following resource from the Church News:

https://www.thechurchnews.com/search/?q=Temple+News+2024

James G. Stokes said...

The back half of the year typically sees the more significant share of major temple construction news. So I think we can and will see many other site location confirmations this year. Particularly, in the time between the last scheduled temple dedication (which is November 23) and the end of the year.

I suspect Russia and China may only see movement when the current political regimes are no longer in power. That may only happen in the Millennium. But there will be much work to do during that 1,000-year period. As one of our current hymns states:

The scepter may fall from the despot's grasp
When with winds of stern justice he copes.
But the pillar of truth will endure to the last
And its firm-rooted buwarks outstand the rude blast
And the wreck of the fell tyrant's hope.

I look forward to that day. Meanwhile, the issue in Dubai UAE, as I've previously noted, is that the Dubai government appears to believe that, just because they invited the Church to build a temple in their nation, they have the right to dictate to the Church how large the temple will be. The Church is reportedly wanting to build a smaller temple there, while the Dubai government wants them to build a Los Angeles-sized temple. And they can't seem to understand that a temple of that size would require the proper religious infrastructure to go with it, including missionary work, a strong Church presence, and sufficient staff for a larger edifice. The Church can't, won't, and shouldn't have to give the Dubai government what they want without expecting something in return. So until the Dubai government thoroughly understands the nuances and infrastructure connected to having such a large temple, the negotiations are pretty much stalled. And the answer is not for the Church to give the Dubai government what they want. Since that government invited the construction of the temple, they should be amenable to the Church building a temple of a size sufficient for the current free practice of the LDS faith there, or they must allow the Church to function more fully with organized wards, stakes, branches, districts, missions, etc. that would stimulate the Church growth in that nation sufficientlly to warrant a Los Angeles sized temple in the UAE. That's the issue there. Negotiations may be at an impasse, with the government not being realistic in its expectations. And that's why the Church hasn't announced more information about that temple in particular.

How it will all work out, I don't know. President Nelson supervised the Church in Europe for several years and is an "old friend of China" by designation, so between him and our two European apostles (Elders Uchtdorf and Kearon), they might have some success getting the Russia temple built. Elder Kearon may also have connections in the Middle Eastern nations that could help negotiate regarding the Dubai temple.

So I wouldn't entirely rule out soemthing being done for the Russia, China, and UAE temples in the relatively near term, but relatively, they could also take years or decades, or may only be built in the Millennium. Just some additional thoughts to consider.

Andrew said...

I live in what will be the UAE Temple District. There is a lot of speculation about reasons for the delay. It is simply that--speculation.
Elder Bednar has asked us members in the ME to be extremely circumspect about the Temple and especially to avoid any comments that could be perceived as critical of the UAE government. I would ask all members of the community on this blog to do the same.
The Temple will come. However, it will come when the time is right. In the Middle East, time flows differently. The Church is not sparing any time or effort to establish the proper relationships and respect with the leaders in this region. We need to give them them space to do that privately. Any public criticism of any regional governments will set the project back.

Daniel Moretti said...

There is a misconception that there is unchecked despotism in foreign nations, while a bastion of freedom endures in the West. Gentlemen, this view is, to say the least, mistaken. Societies organize themselves according to their traditions and needs. We need to remove the plank from our own eye before pointing out the speck in our neighbor's. The Land of the Free is threatened by the same ghosts as other nations, so let us not be so Manichaean in this regard and trust that the Lord will protect and help us.

James G. Stokes said...

Daniel, with all due respect, I can find nowhere in my previous comment that was meant to imply which countries I thought the verse of that song referred to. I am very well aware that America in general (and the United States in particular) has its own "despots". The citation of that verse by me was merely an observation that the Savior will set right everything that is wrong in the world, no matter where it may exist. And I can assure you that I happen to have many "beams" in my own eye, but political blindness or a belief that the United States is immune from, above, or superior to those kinds of situations is not one of them. Do you really think so little of me? If I ever gave that impression, I apologize.

James G. Stokes said...

Thank you for setting the record straight. I was only repeating what had been said about the situation in general in another thread from this blog a while ago. It is nice to hear from someone with firsthand knowledge on the matter. Just goes to show I should check the validity of the information I have before I share it. I generally do so, but I didn't this time. I appreciate you setting the record straight on this. I hope to see the Dubai UAE temple advance through the construction process soon. Nice to know it is being actively worked on. Since you have first-hand knowledge, would you mind keeping me informed on the status of that temple? My contact information is on my blogger profile. It would greatly benefit me and the thoughts I offer here and on my blog if I was getting regular updates on the actual status of that temple from someone with direct knowledge about it that I don't happen to have. Thanks.

James G. Stokes said...

While I don't want to detract or deviate from the subject of temples too much, for those who are interested, the Newsroom and the Church News are providing content related to the upcoming 101st birthday of President Rurssell M. Nelson (which will occur on Tuesday, September 9):

https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/president-nelson-101-jesus-christ

https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/russell-m-nelson-special-witness-jesus-christ

The Newsroom content will be updated every day from now until September 9. The Church News provides this additional tribute:

https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders/2025/09/04/president-russell-m-nelson-101-birthday-lessons-learned/

And, on a note related to Church growth matters, the Church has recently unveiled a new global education initiative specifically for youth:

https://www.thechurchnews.com/living-faith/2025/09/04/succeed-in-school-program-offered-30-countries-youth-mentorship/

My thanks once again to you all.

Daniel Moretti said...

No, please don't take it personally. I used your comment to express my personal feelings about what I see here in this community: uncritical alignment with the government, oblivious to the local idiosyncrasies that exist in ANY country, whether its constitution is inspired or not. In fact, this argument, always proudly emphasized by President Oaks, isn't as popular as he'd like outside the six US areas.

The fact is that the lies propagated by traitorous extremists from Brazil on American soil, in an attempt to convince their government to impose severe sanctions on ours, have left me deeply frustrated. These are similar countries, major powers in their respective regional blocs, equally mixed, with a strong cultural impact and a history of friendship, all of which has been thrown away by the agents of fascism that permeate these societies with ever-increasing influence.

Having no other opportunity to express this concern to colleagues from other countries than here, I ended up overstepping, for which I apologize if I made it seem like it was directed specifically at you. As for the anthem, it's one of my favorites.

There are those who will say I'm wrong to bring these current issues into this space. They would be right, were it not for one simple observation: the situation between countries greatly interferes with the spread of the gospel and the construction of temples. Take the situation in Bengaluru, for example. Or the case of Brazil itself: after Emperor Pedro II of Brazil visited Salt Lake City and was informed of polygamy, he prevented missionary work in his country, which could only begin 50 years later, in the context of World War II.

Anyway, just a few concerns. I apologize again.

Searchthetruth said...

I also think there will be 18 announced and I concentrated on smaller areas.
To symbolically hit four corners of the Americas this time around. Augusta Maine, Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, Grande Praire, Canada and Rio Grande, Argentina. 😆
Seville, Spain
Rigby, Idaho
San Luis Valley, Colorado- I’m going to say Manassa so we have an Ephraim and a Manassa Temple.
Redding, California
Sandy, UT
Since Christ is our Rock- A little Temple in Little Rock, Arkansas
Evanston, Wyoming
“let’s take the long view or eternal view”
With one of the Longviews, Texas or Washington.
Santa Maria, Brazil as a sacred nod to womanhood.
I know I’m heavy in Africa. But several including some firsts:
Porto Harcourt, Nigeria
Porto Novo, Benin (First)
Lome, Togo (First)
Bo, Sierra Leone
Lilongwe, Malawi (First)
Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
East London, South Africa
And Hobart, Australia to fight off that Tasmanian devil! 😈


Searchthetruth said...

I know this is a few more than 18 but they are my top picks.

James G. Stokes said...

I didn't necessarily take it personally. I just wanted to ensure I correctly understood your meaning. The additional context you provided was helpful. Thank you for that. One of the reasons I love that hymn (O, Say What Is Truth?" for any who need the clarification) is that it not only describes the conditions of the world in which we do now and will yet live, but also describes a bit how things will work when the Savior comes again and He is universally recognized as the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, under whose watchful eye the future Millennium of His reign will be the time when all world conditions will be healed, and where there will be no other government but His, and the greatest amount of work will need to be done to gather in the faithful to His fold. I don't know what the world will be like without strife, war, envy, malice, hate, or ill will.

I do know, however, that my worldview is somewhat limited to what I read about in print and online, especially in terms of the experiences of others. I regret that there is so much suffering in the world, and I'm certainly not immune to that in my own life. I think that's why I visit this particular online forum so much, and why I have sought to expand my horizons through contributing to various online databases like Wikipedia. I would likely have a more informed grasp of worldly conditions if I were able to travel, but that capability is currently beyond me.

And so, I draw strength from what I read in Church resources and reputable news sources. And while some may find themselves depressed by the conditions of a fallen world that in many ways is growing increasingly more wicked, my patriarchal blessing promises me that I will be at peace with the world throughout my life. So far, so good.

Anyways, what I was trying to say is that I didn't take offense at all to your comment, I just wanted to clarify what you meant. And now that we're on the same page in that regard, I am looking forward to whatever comes because I know what the end result will be. It's just the semantics of getting there that could be problematic for some. And I'm grateful for this particular online forum where we can share ideas and understand one another. That said, hopefully my thoughts, such as they are, are beneficial to most who read them. Thank you, Daniel.

John Pack Lambert said...

I think Searchtehtruth's list makes sense. I even would love a temple in Porto Novo, but I suspect Benin's first temple will be in Cotonou. I have been wrong about many things though, so we shall see. I also sort of hope they would name the temple Gqeberha (the new name of what used to be Port Elizabeth). I think it would be best if we had a temple that had a more indegenous name. Plus, that is pretty much the only way we will ever get a temple that starts with Gq. This is a case of a temple fullfilling a need you did not realize you had until it was filled. Sort of like Elder Wu becoming the first Asian/Latina American general authority. Only several orders of magnitude more niche. I mean we could at some point say "would it not be awesome to have temples that start with every single 2 letter starting combo". However since there are 676, and lots of repeated ones (how many temples start Sa, or Fo), I doubt we would ever get close to that even being possible to get (Is there any place on earth that starts Xx, or Xz, or actually most of the possible 676 2 letter start combinations?)

This is not meant to be taken as more than a humorous aside, and I hope no one takes offense at it.

James G. Stokes said...

President Nelson has made a habit of announcing more than one temple in a single Church area at one time somewhat frequently in recent years. In April of last year, two temples each were announced for the North America Southwest, North America West, Pacific, and Utah Areas. The next conference, the only double announcement was for the North America Southwest Area. And in April of this year, it was two each for the North America Central & Pacific Areas of the Church. So he could easily do more than one temple in more than one area again next month. Africa may be underserved in temples, and a lot of growth is happening continent-wide, so anything's likely at this point.

James G. Stokes said...

And this just in: the arrangements for the October 2025 General Conference have just been confirmed. My thanks once again to you all.

Aaron Cornelius said...

I've always been intrigued by how present American politics are in the minds of people overseas. The average American knows precious little about nations outside of our own (let alone have a grasp of any aspect of their politics), and sadly our politicians often reflect this even if they themselves know better.
Daniel, I partly agree with you, though I do believe that the presence or absence of certain freedoms can be a means of judging a government, regardless of the structure or external perceptions about that government. As a Latter-day Saint I believe the pinnacle of freedom is the right to worship the true church without fear or oppression, including sharing it with others. Everything else simply helps secure that freedom.
In Russia Latter-day Saints are persecuted, and the church is struggling. In Kiev it is not. So, in a comparison I choose Kiev.
In Brasil the church has been thriving, regardless of whether Bolsonaro or Lula are in power in Brasilia. So, I support o governo Brasileiro.
Most U.S. states are in fact ruled by one-party, with Utah being a Republican dominated system (I was raised in a Democratic dominated state), but the church is safe and even thriving in all fifty states - so the politics of each party are less critical to the success of the Lord's work than many conservative members of the church are inclined to believe.
China has a long way to go before the church is safe there. North Korea and Iran are the exact opposite of safe places. Pakistan, Saudi Arabia have improved, Cuba has made huge improvements, India has been backsliding under Modhi... and so on. In short, that is the only (or most important) metric that matters to me when I evaluate national systems in my mind.

Aaron Cornelius said...

James, I have been so impressed by President Nelson's sensitivity to the fact that this is a global church, not merely American, or Utahan. While I loved past presidents of the church, he has really taken this mantle on well.

Many things in the states that were not culturally relevant to a global audience have been reduced in emphasis, while more efforts have been made to serve the global church. I am thinking of church pageants, the constant emphasis on pioneers, and the church's heavy commitment to scouting in the states. Consider the global emphasis of the new hymnal project as another example, or the growing diversity in church leadership. Even the 'rebranding' of the church away from the term 'Mormon' feels like a nod to this trend.

The rapid building of temples wherever a mature body of the saints are found is a great example of this. Thank goodness the church has the wealth to support this global campaign to establish a celestial qualified people even in materially poor parts of the world!

James G. Stokes said...

Well put, Aaron! Thanks for that thoughtful commentary.

James G. Stokes said...

I think we still have many "pioneers" of the Church in their own right, and I don't follow the logic that only those of former days can be correctly termed "pioneers". That's why I also love the children's song: To Be a Pioneer. The second verse particularly talks about what it takes to be a pioneer in any age of the world. But you are correct. President Nelson has been particularly sensitive to the global nature of the Church, and he's also made no secret of the fact that the Lord can trust his fellow Apostles with tasks traditionally handled by the First Presidency, like conducting General Conference sessions and the First Presidency's Christmas devotional, dedicating a majority of the completed temples, even handling "traditional" First Presidency tasks.

And his apostolic picks have been astounding: The first Asian American, Brazilian American, and a second European apostle (the latter of whom also has strong connections to and experience living in the Middle East and is also the first adult convert apostle in over a century). Some of my favorite addresses in recent General Conferences have been given by Elders Gong, Soares, and Kearon. He promised as he became Church President that there would be "more flavors in the mix", and he has delivered on promise already. He's even added a more international mix to the Presidency of the Seventy as well.

3 global magazines! A global hymnbook! New global initiatives! He's done it all and then some. And he's not done yet. At almost 101, he's still reportedly going strong, despite the back injury and slowing down due to age-related causes. But he's opened up the international nature of the Church no doubt. I don't think anyone can successfully or logically argue that this Church is still just a "Utah Church". And it fills me with wonder to be alive to see it all happening now, or, as the prophet himself once put it, "right before our eyes." He is definitely the man for the times.

James G. Stokes said...

I should specify: I meant Elder Kearon is the second *current* European apostle in the current Quorum of the Twelve, not that he was the second European apostle overall, which is not the case. I am likewise glad the Church has the financial stability to build so many temples in so many places. No need for a hiatus on temple announcements these days. Of course, the question of the Church's "wealth" is somewhat of a loaded issue in circles outside of the Church, and there are unfortunately some unscrupulous people who somehow feel entitled to request their donated offerings back from the Church when they become disaffected or leave. And there are certainly also those who try to stop temple construction as well. Thank goodness these individuals are in the miniority, and for courts that are inclined to side with the Church on such issues.

Aaron Cornelius said...

The changes in the church over the last decade-ish have been so remarkable! I'm very proud of our church and its constant progress. My son just came home from two years in the Boise mission, and my next son is off to Chile in two months! To believe that kids like that are what we depend on to grow this church is astounding! I say that partly as a playful poke at my boys, but the miracle of this church's steady and sure progress really is a thing to behold.

As a proud New Englander, I always struggled with the Pioneer identity that was so emphasized in the church. I was aware of the church's efforts to emphasize pioneers in the church outside of the western settlers of the mid 1800s, but the cultural reliance on the symbols, names, places, images, and heritage of those brave saints was constantly present. My ancestors came over on the Mayflower, they started and then fought the revolutionary war, they settled Northern New England and farmed its rocky hills, they fought in the Civil War, shattering the confederacy and freeing the slaves, and so on. I had my own rich heritage which was entirely absent in church dialogue. As a young missionary I encountered opposition from some westerners, who all seemed to know the same places and cultural references that felt a little foreign to me.

No bitterness, my five Utah companions were wonderful men, and I have since moved to Utah. That said, the lower visibility of pioneers in the modern church culture has been welcome.

Daniel Moretti said...

What I meant, with the subtlety of a stampeding wildebeest, is that Xi isn't all bad, just as Trump certainly isn't all good. They're certainly not saints. They operate based on self-interest. Each society organizes itself as it sees fit internally, but the greater a country's influence on the world stage, the more that choice impacts, for good or ill, people across the planet. But there are indeed dangerous people impacting for bad: Bannon is as cunning as Putin, Elon is as dangerous as Kim. I hope these people never set their sights on the Church of Christ. I also hope that, even within different regimes and distinct social organizations, the Church thrives in China, India, and Russia. Thank you all

Aaron Cornelius said...

Daniel, I agree with that statement perfectly.

James G. Stokes said...

Those changes certainly have been remarkable, haven't they? In a lot of ways, it took President Nelson being willing to "turn the key" as it were on a lot of things that were "traditionally done" differently. That's all they are: traditions. I'm glad the Church has differentiated between what is doctrinal (unchanging) and what is merely tradition (that can be altered or eliminated).

I'm sorry about your struggles with the "pioneer identity". I honor the sacrifices of all who came before, irrespective of "where they came from". In my mind, such individuals clearly have "pioneer hearts" in their own right. But that's a comparison that makes sense to me based on my experience of mostly being Utah-raised by necessity my entire life.

The Church has also, under President Nelson, emphasized pioneers in every land more. And coming from a South African mother whose parents were both adult converts does give me some insight into the international nature of the Church. So I hope you know that when I speak of pioneers, I recognize and revere those who do not match the "traditional" definition of that word just as much as I do those who crossed the plains. In my mind, they are all one and the same. And I'm grateful for the "pioneers" of all kinds in my own heritage. I hope that helps.

James G. Stokes said...

As do I. And if I ever presented my views as merely being just "black and white", I also need to set the record straight that I know there are "gray areas" for everyone. I wouldn't feel any more qualified to judge anyone else's "gray areas" than I think anyone else would be to judge mine. There is good and bad in all. The question is, which will we allow to shine more brightly in us? God doesn't force the human mind, and neither should any of us. I only know of One Perfect Man to ever walk the Earth. I'm not him, and neither is anyone else. Thanks for that reminder, Daniel!

Jonathan Goudy said...

100+ temples will be announced.

Chris D. said...

Confirmed:

Upper Hutt New Zealand Stake (509523)
Discontinued on 31 August 2025

The newly combined "Wellington New Zealand Stake (504459)" consists of:

Avalon Branch (2303434) (*new)
Featherstone Branch (53074)
Harbour Ward (53112)
Lower Hutt Ward (138150) (* ex-Avalon Park)
Masterton Ward (53368)
Tawa Ward (317314)
Upper Hutt Ward (102261) (* ex-Totara Park)
Wainuiomata Ward (53546)
Wellington Ward (53597)
Hataitai Ward (Samoan) (98280)
Hutt Valley Ward (Samoan) (1081470)

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/504459

Chris D. said...

Sorry, I meant Featherston, not Featherstone Branch.

Chris D. said...

Also, the new Avalon Branch (2303434) is (Tongan).

Daniel Moretti said...

I thank you for reading my machinations...

Ryan Searcy said...

Curious why the stake was discontinued. Sure, it had 4 wards and a branch, but some stakes have only 3 or 4 wards in them and still active. The map appears to indicate the Featherston Branch was discontinued, since it is not listed with the others in the reorganized Wellington NZ Stake. The creation of a Tongan-speaking branch shows no real change in the number of congregations, which is 9 wards and 1 branch. As far as I can tell, none of the wards were consolidated, so it doesn't seem either stake was on life support (certainly not like the Hastings stakes), but I'm wondering if it was a preemptive move to free up positions for temple workers in Hamilton so they can be ready when Wellington is finished (the groundbreaking was only a month ago).

miro said...

When I checked the meetinghouse locator today there where only 6 wards and an branch in the Wellingtion stake. 3 Chaples where empty. The Boundaries are not readrawn yet. So it will still take a few days till all changes will show on the meetinghouse locator.

miro said...

So here is my top 20 temple location list:
Bristol England,
Lyon (Toulouse) France or Southern Spain (Seville, Murcia, Valencia), (Not anounced at the same time)
Cottonwood Heights/Holladay/Sandy Utah Temple,
Evanston Wyoming,
Rigby Idaho,
Longview Texas or Jackson Mississippi, (Not anounced at the same time)
Augusta Maine,
Charleston West Virginia,
Macon Georgia,
Poza Rica Mexico,
Quevedo Ecuador,
Tacna Peru,
Santa Maria Brazil,
Neuquen Argentina,
Yamoussoukro Cote d'Ivoire,
Lomé Togo,
Port Harcourt Nigeria,
Angeles Philippines,
Daejeon Korea,
Christchurch New Zealand

Ryan Searcy said...

Looks like it's showing differently now, as you say, and it does show evidence of consolidations. The Harbour, Tawa, and Wainuiomata Wards and the Featherston Branch all appear to have been discontinued (the areas these congregations covered show "No residential ward assigned for this Location."

Lower Hutt Ward (used to be Avalon Park Ward, presumably also absorbed the Harbour and Wainuiomata Wards).
Upper Hutt Ward (used to be Totara Park Ward, presumably also absorbed the Featherston Branch).
Wairarapa Ward (name changed from the Masterton Ward, could have also taken some from the Featherston Branch).
Wellington Ward (presumably absorbed the Tawa Ward.
Avalon Branch (Tongan) does not currently show any boundary.
Hataitai Ward (Samoan) still shows the boundary of the former Wellington NZ Stake
Hutt Valley Ward (Samoan) shows an identical boundary to the Lower Hutt Ward (presumably, this will be adjusted with the others).

Ryan Searcy said...

It appears the Chiquimula Guatemala South District is no longer active. I cannot search for it on the meetinghouse locator and it shows the entire area of where I presume the district was as part of the Zacapa Guatemala Stake.

I'm trying to update my prediction map, have most of the world completed, just need to finish Guatemala, Mexico, United States, and Canada.

Spencer said...

Church leaders didn’t say much about the nazi regime, Helmuth Hubener and others said how bad there government was. Hubner was beheaded. Excommunicated, but first Presidency overruled it. Tragically executed should t of been.

Ezra Taft Benson was vocal against communist governments. Republicans and democrats were. No freedom there. J. Reuben Clark, Marion G. Romney, David O Mckay spoke against it as well.

Spencer W. Kimball asked to pray for countries to be open and the Iron curtain fell down.

Before the Mille Kim we will be proselyting in China, North Korea the Middle East. Has to happen before the second coming.Will happen on Gods time.

A marine and princess ran off together returned missionary from Bahrain. They got divorced. The Lord did not condone that. We go in the front door. Israel we will be proselyting before Millenium. Nations will open there doors. Keep praying for it to happen.

Chris D. said...

Thanks, Ryan. Yes, It appears the Chiquimula Guatemala South District (2195283), was merged with the Zacapa Guatemala Stake (524697), on 08/31/2025.

All 3 branches were retained:
Esquipulas Branch (324183)
Ipala Branch (284483)
Quetzaltepeque Branch (2186225)

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/524697

The District was still on the Meetinghouse Site under the Mission on Tuesday evening after work when I checked all the known missions with Districts for the weekly updates.

John Pack Lambert said...

How close is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to having a branch in Burkina Faso? How are things progressing in South Sudan?

Is a stake or a mission in Senegal more likely first? At some level it might make sense to have 1 mission cover Senegsl, Gambia, Mali and Guinea.

However another issue is what is most pressing. Reaching every nation or every tongue first? Logistically it is far easier for the Church to reach new countries than to teach the gospel in New languages.

Chris D. said...

Finally, the Guimba Philippines District (614068) has become the Muñoz Philippines Stake (614068), on the Meetinghouse site, with 5 Wards and 1 Branch.

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/614068

James G. Stokes said...

That would be awesome, but I doubt it is reasonable, likely, or even logical. No offense intended, and I hope none is taken.

David Todd said...

https://www.abc27.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/846061100/olerio-homes-announces-sale-of-carroll-crossing-development-site-in-southlake-texas/

Any insight as to the validity of the claim in this article that a temple is being built in Southlake, Texas? Part of me wonders if the writer doesn't know the difference between a church building and a temple.

JTB said...

I don't see this being a temple, just a chapel. There aren't any church buildings in Southlake at the moment, and the surrounding buildings all have 4 or 3 units. A chapel in Southlake would allow for further expansion of units in that area and would be closer to the current membership.

Michael Worley said...

This won't answer your question, but I recently met an RM who served in Senegal. It seems like the church is growing there even if it's less explosive than Abidjan. The mission seemed to gradually be assigning more elders to the non-Cote d'Ivore nations.

Ryan Searcy said...

The property in question is certainly large enough for a new temple and meetinghouse. I think Colleyville was on some people's radars for a while. 15 acres is the same size of land for the Jordan River UT, Mendoza Argentina, and Preston England Temples. Mendoza has a large meetinghouse, the temple, and an arrival center. Texas wouldn't have need of an arrival center, but perhaps it could house a replacement of the distribution center in Dallas? It appears to be attached to the back end of the temple, maybe that space could be used if a renovation is needed? Alternately, any excess can just be sold off. Mendoza is just shy of 22,000 sq ft, while Fort Worth shows at 30,000 sq ft. A temple at that location would serve 6 stakes:

-Alliance TX stake (10 wards)
-Colleyville TX Stake (9 wards, 1 branch)
-Denton TX stake (11 wards)
-Fort Worth TX North Stake (8 wards)
-Hurst TX Stake (10 wards)
-Lewisville TX stake (11 wards, 1 branch)

Ryan Searcy said...

I should note that the Denton and Lewisville TX Stakes showed the same amount of time traveling to the property in Southlake as going to the Dallas TX Temple.

Matt said...

Other Matt here...

For the Dubai Temple, why can't the Church just build a larger building but make it multipurpose? Temple, with a meetinghouse with church offices with accommodations etc. And maybe leave some space unused or unfinished for future growth?

So the shell of the building is opulent and grand for UAE standards, but the inside can be adjusted to according to need.

Matt said...

Other Matt here...

@LChrisJones

I would imagine the Rexburg Temple will mainly serve BYUI students. And then the Teton River Temple serves the region.

DDietzeHermosa said...

After having a branch briefly in Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada between 2004 and 2009, the Church is back in Iqaluit with a group. It is under the supervision of the Champlain Ward of the Ottawa Ontario Stake. Looks to be formed of a handful of families, mostly immigrants.

rsp said...

What exactly would the benefit be from having the "alphabet covered"?

rsp said...

Cottonwood Heights, Holladay, or Sandy are in southeast Salt Lake *County* or southeast Salt Lake *Valley*. Southeast Salt Lake City ends within a few blocks of 2700 South – miles from Holladay, let alone CH or Sandy.

John Pack Lambert said...

While I could see South Lake being the location of a new temple and with the downsizing of the Fairview Texas Temple metro Dallas needs at least a 4th temple, I would not jump to a conclusion South Lake will have a temple announced this year, although it could. Many temples have been built on land The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints had owned for decades and left vacant. So there are many outcomes that may happen.

On another note the Detroit Michigan Temple is moving from 5 sessions for temple baptistey on Saturdays to 7.

DeeAnn said...

I could definitely see Southlake as a temple option in the future. I would think Denton would get one first, but I could be wrong. The Fort Worth temple in Burleson would have Fort Worth, Weatherford, Burleson, Arlington, Possibly Waco and parts of the Dallas stake (Waxahatchie area) cover it if Southlake had a temple.There is a lot of growth in the area so additional stakes will probably be forthcoming.

Kenny said...

I am going to predict 18 temple to make an even 400 like others have said.

I narrowed my picks down to the following 23 locations, knowing full well that's more than 18.

Lome, Togo
East London, South Africa
Tirana, Albania
Seville, Spain
Taichung, Taiwan
Tarlac, Philippines
Hobart, Australia
Neuguen, Argentina
Guayaquil, Ecuador # 2
Kingston, Jamaica
Acapulco, Mexico
Poza Rica, Mexico
Durango, Mexico
Augusta, Maine
Charleston, West Virginia
Little Rock, Arkansas
Mobile, Alabama
Jackson, Mississippi
Temecula, California
Hesperia, California
Henderson, Nevada
Evanston, Wyoming
Hurricane, Utah

John Pack Lambert said...

The Church News just published an article about 120 people baptized in a single service in the Moriba Town district in the Bo Sierra Leone mission.

The article said there have been 1,200 baptisms in that mission in the last 3 months. It also says the mission went from 8 to 21 mission branches. I am not sure if this is all branches not in stakes or just branches not in a district.

The mission president, Scott Wyatt, also said sacrament meeting attendance is increasing faster than baptisms.

The article Aldo says one branch, most like the Moriba Town branch itself, is about to be split from 1 to 5 branches. The district seems to include the one current branch in Moriba Town as well as some outlying branches that can be hard to reach Moriba Town in the rainy season.

These factors make me think a Bo Temple is very likely, if not this conference than at one in the near future.

We had at least 3 more Converts baptized in my branch today, and one baptized on Thursday. Two who were baptized today bore their testimonies in Sacrament meeting.

John Pack Lambert said...

Looking at the map I would not be surprised if we see a Takoradi Ghana Temple soon.

Ohhappydane33 said...

So why is your branch still a branch with all this convert baptism success?

Bryansb1984 said...

The Mesquite Nevada Temple would have 4 stakes
Mesquite Nevada West Stake
Mesquite Nevada East Stake
Logandale Nevada West Stake
Logandale Nevada East Stake
And it would be a small temple

Bryansb1984 said...

I'm going to add a few more
Springville, Utah
Mapleton, Utah
Herriman, Utah
Ammon, Idaho
Guayaquil Ecuador South (2nd temple)
Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Sao Paulo Brazil South (3rd temple)
Santiago Chile South (3rd temple)
Boulder, Colorado

John Pack Lambert said...

My branch is still a branch because of 2 factors. One is that several of the people who have been baptized have moved away. We had one family of 7 get baptized and within a few weeks thry moved to Arkansas. We had another case where a sister was baptized and that week moved to Chicago.

The other factor is that you do not get Melchizedek Priesthood holders immediately. One of the brothers passing the sacrament today was a recent convert. He was ordained to the priesthood before we sustained him so that he would be ordained in time to pass the sacrament.

We are making progress on multiple levels. Based on us having 5 additional move ins or reactivated people in sacrament meeting today we may well be very close to being a branch. I know at one point we had enough active full tithe paying melchized priesthood holders. We have had several people move away since, so I am not sure if we meet that number.

Although to be realistic, I am a lot less clear on the advantages of being a ward over being a branch as opposed to being a stake over bring a district.

I am also not 100 percent sure that making my branch into a ward would be the most helpful move forward. The best move forward might be splitting the branch into two. I know at one point a member of our elders quorum Presidency thought it would be good to create a geographical group in the west end of our branch.

The underlying goal is to bring as many people as possible to Christ. To do thst it does not matter if we are a ward or a branch.

The big advantage of us becoming a ward would be it would make the creation of an additional stake in metro Detroit more likely.

That would be good, but as I said under the best conditions it takes several months for baptisms to translate into additional full-tithe paying active melchizedek priesthood holders who are capable of holding leadership callings. That may well happen, but it will be next year.

Chris D. said...

Recently, 120 Men, Women and Children in Moriba Town, Sierra Leone, were all baptized on the same day in August. As reported by the Church News link below :

https://www.thechurchnews.com/members/2025/09/07/120-baptized-moriba-town-sierra-leone-africa-one-day/

SteedLaw said...

Great list, Matt. Thank you so much for this blog. I have been a silent participant here for many years. Really is so great that you document the growth of our Lord's Church this way:

Love your temple list. Here is mine:

1. Angeles or Olongapo, Philippines
2. Bo, Sierra Leone
3. Port Harcourt, Nigeria
4. Tremonton, Utah
5, North Ogden/Pleasant View, Utah
6. Hyrum/Nibley, Utah
7. Rigby, Idaho
8. Lomé, Togo
9. Evanston, Wyoming
10. Poza Rica, Mexico
11. Santa Clarita/Thousand Oaks, California
12. Pretoria, South Africa
13, Punta Arenas, Chile
14. Santa Maria, Brazil
15. New Delhi, India
16. Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast
17. Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
18. Resistencia, Argentina
19. Puenta Alto, Chile
20. Neuquen, Argentina

Chris D. said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Gary Stroble said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ryan Searcy said...

Haven't completed the United States or Canada yet, but here is a pared down version of my "More Likely" list. It was really hard to pare it down, but these are just the more likely of the "More Likely."

AFRICA
-Gaborone Botswana (1 stake, 2 districts)
-Yaoundé Cameroon (1 stake, 3 districts)
-Daloa Côte d'Ivoire (6 stakes, 4 districts)
-Kinshasa (Masina) DR Congo (~9 stakes, 2 districts)
-Lilongwe Malawi (~3 stakes, ~2 district)
-Ibadan Nigeria (6 stakes, 1 district)
-Onitsha Nigeria (7 stakes, 5 districts)
-Bo Sierra Leone (5 stakes, 2 districts)
-East London South Africa (3 stakes)
-Lomé Togo (5 stakes, ~3 districts)
-Bulawayo Zimbabwe (4 stakes, 1 district)

ASIA
-Sendai Japan (1 stake, 4 districts)
-Daejeon Korea (4 stakes, 2 districts)
-Olongapo City Philippines (9 stakes)
-Puerto Princesa Philippines (1 stake, 2 districts)
-Taichung Taiwan (~6 stakes)

CENTRAL AMERICA
-Tres Rios Costa Rica (5 stakes, 1 district)
-Choluteca Honduras (2 stakes, 2 districts)
-La Ceiba Honduras (3 stakes)
-Kingston Jamaica (1 stake, 1 district)
-Acapulco Mexico (3 stakes, ~1 district)
-Ciudad Nezahualcóyoti Mexico (~12 stakes)
-Ciudad Victoria Mexico (3 stakes, ~1 district)
-Coatzacoalcos Mexico (3 stakes, 2 districts)
-Monclova Mexico (3 stakes, 2 districts)
-Morelia Mexico (5 stakes)
-Poza Rica Mexico (6 stakes)
-David Panama (1 stake, 2 districts)
-Port of Spain Trinidad and Tobago (1 stake, ~6 districts)

EUROPE
-Tiranë Albania (1 stake, ~6 districts)
-Bristol England//Cardiff Wales (~6 stakes)
-Tolouse France (3 stakes
-Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain (1 stake)
-Murcia Spain (4 stakes)
-Geneva Switzerland (3 stakes)

OCEANIA
-Deer Park Australia (~4 stakes)
-Devonport Australia (2 stakes)
-Delap Marshall Islands (~3 stakes, ~1 district)
-Christchurch New Zealand (2 stakes, ~1 district)
-Lae//Goroka Papua New Guinea (3 stakes, 2 districts)***

SOUTH AMERICA
-Comodoro Rivadavia Argentina (3 stakes, ~2 districts)
-Neuquen Argentina (5 stakes)
-Resistencia Argentina (5 stakes, 6 branches)
-San Miguel de Tucumán Argentina (4 stakes, 1 district)
-Tarija Bolivia (3 stakes, 3 districts)
-Araçatuba Brazil (6 stakes, 1 district)
-Canoas Brazil (~11 stakes, 2 districts)
-Pelotas Brazil (4 stakes, 1 district)
-Porto Velho Brazil (2 stakes, 1 district)
-Santa Maria Brazil (~7 stakes, 1 district)
-São Bernardo do Campo (~13 stakes)
-São Gonçalo Brazil (~5 stakes, 1 district)
-Soracaba Brazil (5 stakes, 2 districts)
-La Serena Chile (3 stakes, 3 districts)
-Puente Alto Chile (~12 stakes, ~1 district)
-Punta Arenas Chile (2 stakes, 1 district)
-Talca Chile (3 stakes, ~2 districts)
-Temuco Chile (5 stakes, 2 districts)
-Bucaramanga Colombia (3 stakes)
-Duran Ecuador (~9 stakes, 3 districts)
-Machala Ecuador (3 stakes, 1 district)
-Carabayllo Peru (~10 stakes, 1 district)
-Chimbote Peru (4 stakes, 1 district)
-Chincha Alta Peru (4 stakes, 1 district)
-Huánuco Peru (6 stakes, 1 district)
-Puno Peru (3 stakes)
-Tacna Peru (5 stakes)
-Durazno Uruguay (5 stakes, 1 district)

***Could go either way, both cities are in to top 10 most populous cities in Papua New Guinea, being #2 and #7 respectively. Lae makes sense because it's the second largest city and has an international airport, so many places in northern PNG can just fly in. Goroka also makes sense because it's a central location on the road system (between 3 "large" cities - Lae, Madang, and Mount Hagen, although it's a 3-6 hour drive from those places) and has a regional airport.

Nephi said...

More Stakes doesn't mean more members. The Logandale Stakes didn't need to be split either. Both Mesquite and Logandale were hell bent on creating new stakes out of thin air. The Stakes are so small they continue to operate the youth programs as if it were one Stake. In short, between Mesquite and Logandale there is barely enough active membership for 2 stakes. Hope this helps.

BB said...

Prague, Sendai, and Thousand Oaks are intriguing locations that I do not have on my list.

I do think Prague will be one of the next locations announced in Europe.

Alex said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alex said...

The church's goal is to eventually have all members within an hour's drive of a temple, and the vast majority (85%) currently already live within 200 miles of a temple.
The number of temples has increased significantly in recent years, with a specific goal for at least 80% of temple-recommend-holding members to live within an hour of a temple in the near future.

James G. Stokes said...

On this Monday, the open house for the Grand Junction Colorado Temple got underway with a media day. I don't know at this point whether or not to expect any additional major temple construction news today at 2:00 PM MDT, because I could see it going either way and I've been wrong on both counts before. So I will be looking forward to that hour either way. My thanks once again to you all.

Thomas Wagner said...

Rendering released for the Osaka Japan Temple. Hopefully they can get a groundbreaking soon.

John Pack Lambert said...

The goal I have heard is 90% of members within an hours travel of the temple. All members would be a very high order. I think it is considered as travel. You need to base it on the travel people do. This is one factor in Ephraim getting a temple, travel for Snow College students to Manti is not super easy. However I think the fact that Manti Temple is not wheel chair accessible, and there was no way to make it take without major changes was another factor.

The open house for the Grand Junction Temple has begun. A site rendering was released for the Osaka Japan Temple. I believe this puts us at 49 temples with known locations without ground having been broken.

Hopefully we can have several more groundbreaking this year.

John Pack Lambert said...

Of the current cities with a temple announced but none completed Lagos Nigeria is the only I could see getting a temple announced. Okay, Lehi Utah as well, but that seems much less likely. Alpine or Highland maybe but a second Temple in Lehi would be unexpected.

On Lae or Goroka. Is there any place in Papus New Guinea you can fly from to only one of those 2 airports?

SteedLaw said...

Sorry, I added one change (Gulfport, Mississippi):

1. Angeles or Olongapo, Philippines
2. Bo, Sierra Leone
3. Port Harcourt, Nigeria
4. Tremonton, Utah
5, North Ogden/Pleasant View, Utah
6. Hyrum/Nibley, Utah
7. Rigby, Idaho
8. Lomé, Togo
9. Evanston, Wyoming
10. Poza Rica, Mexico
11. Santa Clarita/Thousand Oaks, California
12. Pretoria, South Africa
13, Punta Arenas, Chile
14. Santa Maria, Brazil
15. New Delhi, India
16. Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast
17. Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
18. Resistencia, Argentina
19. Puenta Alto, Chile
20. Neuquen, Argentina
21. Gulfport, Mississippi

Chris D. said...

FYI, The Wellington New Zealand Stake (504459), may be renamed Wellington and Hutt New Zealand Stake (504459), with tomorrow's Meetinghouse update. Unverified though, if someone wants to check the CDOL official list this evening.

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/504459

Chris D. said...

I still stand by my prediction, that we won't come anywhere near 100 "New" Stakes in 2025. Right now, we have 61 New Stakes with last on organized in Tarlac Philippines, three weeks ago on 08/24. No New Stakes in last 2 sundays(08/31 and 09/07). And only 2 new stakes planned in all of September in Centerton next sunday and 1 other location the following sunday. When we would need a minumum of 10 in September, and 10 each month after to reach the 39 left for that goal. Not including mergers.

Eduardo said...

I love the temples and all that we do there. It is amazing. May the influence of God through His temples continue to increase and expand.
A comment about growth in a new stake in Brambleton (Ashburn), Virginia. I heard that perhaps this stake has more youth than anywhere east of the Mississippi River. Does that seem right?

Are there ways to measure statistics like that? I think that the stake is currently sponsoring/supporting 60 full time missionaries, which is pretty good for a small stake. Maybe 8 wards, or 7 wards and a Spanish Branch.

Do others have numbers of missionaries from their stakes, or numbers of youth attending their seminaries, or simply within their wards?

Scott said...

Here are some locations I'd find interesting to have temples announced. Many of these would decrease travel times for remote areas or have the first temple on an island or in a country.

Christchurch, New Zealand (first on the south island where there are 2 stakes and longer travel times to temples)

Hobart or Devonport, Tasmania, Australia (2 stakes and this is an island with added expense and travel times to go to the temple)

Lilongwe, Malawi

Augusta, Maine

Cabo San Lucas, Mexico (South Baja California has 2 stakes and is remote at the end of the peninsula and could be used by tourists)

Hyrum, Utah

Tirane, Albania

Puerto Princessa, Philippines (1st on that island and the island is more remote)

Punta Arenas, Chile or Rio Grande, Argentina (Patagonia, this is very remote but has 2 stakes and a district)

Palmas, Brazil

Cuiaba, Brazil

Jeonju, South Korea

Taichung, Taiwan

Evanston, Green River, or Rock Springs, Wyoming

Scooter said...

Has anyone seen major success in missionary work through engaging the community through events? I’m hoping to plan a Halloween and Christmas activity for my ward that is open to the community. Just wondering if anyone has heard of these events leading to success.

Anonymous said...

I think 18 temples will be announced. Here are my guesses:

1-18:
Poza Rica, Mexico
Onitsha, Nigeria
Taichung, Taiwan
Resistencia, Argentina
Pelotas, Brazil
Longview, TX, USA
Passo Fundo, Brazil
Yopougon Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire
Kimbanseke Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Angeles OR Olongapo, Philippines
Bo, Sierra Leone
Luputa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Lomé, Togo
Machala, Ecuador
Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Little Rock, AR, USA
Barcelona, Venezuela
Redding, CA, USA

19-20:
Lancaster, CA, USA
Monclova, Mexico

Anonymous said...

I have seen success (in terms of people showing up) when there are personal invitations from members, missionaries, fliers, Facebook posts, etc.

JTB said...

You might find this interview with a Bishop in Chicago interesting: https://leadingsaints.org/when-clapping-happens-at-church-a-how-i-lead-interview-with-devin-pope/
They have had massive success by hosting community-wide events.

Adam said...

I'm really looking forward to a temple being announced in Poza Rica, as I served most of my mission in the two stakes there and in the nearby Papantla Stake. Hopefully this conference it finally happens!

Chris D. said...

The Wellington New Zealand Stake (504459), has been renamed the Wellington and Hutt New Zealand Stake (504459), in the Meetinghouse site.

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/504459

Johnathan Reese Whiting said...

Happy 101st Birthday to the Prophet!

John Pack Lambert said...

In an interview with someone from the missionary department by The Church News there was mention of success with a community event by a ward in Texas.

It can work. Advertising is key.

Today as has been mentioned is President Nelson's 101st birthday. I looked at his biography on Wikipedia. It looks like it has not been updated much since 2020.

The policy changes section does not cover anything since then. I think at least some changes to service missionary assignment could be covered there, maybe the announcement of the BYU medical school and a few others.

The international ministry section might be able to mention his broadcast address to Canada.

There should also be mention of his 2018 address to the NAACP in Detroit, and maybe his 2020 join statement with NAACP leaders. The Nelson-Mandela-Ghandhi prize is mentioned but might merit more information.

His 2023 book is not included.

The temples section stops with April e020. He has announced about 150 temples since then. He has dedicated 2, rededicated two and broken ground on 2.

There may well be other things that could be covered. I am hoping I can convince someone here to go and update the article slightly. I would be am under an editing restriction imposed in August 3021 that prevents me from doing so. I asked to lift that editing restriction in October 2022 and was nearly banned from all editing just for asking to lift it, so I am very hesitant about asking to lift it. I keep telling myself it is time to ask that at least some of the ban on my participation in deletion discussions be lifted, especially since it was written in a way that even though that was the only thing ever discussed, my input of deleting articles, they also banned me from the unrelated participation in discussion about categories.

Anyway, the article on Russell M. Nelson is really in need of being updated so if anyone feels up to at least trying at the task I would encourage doing do.

Bryansb1984 said...

Osaka Japan Temple, I've noticed a pattern
2023 Temple announced
2024 site announced
2025 rendering released
Could we see a groundbreaking in 2026?

Chris D. said...

I recently read a comment that next Sunday, September 13th, 2025, the Stake Conference of the Tarawa Kiribati West Stake (525219), may be split. To create a new Stake, unknown name. Currently, with 10 wards and 2 branches.

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/525219

Also, the Tarawa Kiribati North District (2030985), has a conference the same day, and again during another Conference a month later on October 26, 2025 may become a Stake. Currently having 8 Branches. In the comment, it was referred to as the Temaiku District. I wonder if the new stake would be called the Temaiku Kiribati Stake.

Looking at the Stake Maps. The 3 branches of Borotiam Branch (2158469), Tuarabu Ward (314412), and Tabontebike-Abaiang Branch (282553), currently part of the Tarawa West Stake, geographically closer to the Tarawa Kiribati North District. In my humble opinion could also be incorporated into a new North Stake.
https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/2030985

Chris D. said...

Elder Stevenson recently ministered in August 2025, in the West African country of Senegal, with a country with, as of August 1st, 325 Members in 1 District of 5 Branches.

https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders/2025/09/09/elder-gary-e-stevenson-testifies-jesus-christ-zion-senegal-africa/

EveoftheNorthCountry said...

I seen someone mention this further up but I have a question: Why is it not likely that Grande Prairie Alberta Canada or Prince George British Columbia Canada could see a temple in the next couple years?

Currently for wards and branches in the in the GP Stake - they have to travel to the Edmonton AB temple which can be anywhere from 4 - 12 hours. For Prince George British Columbia - they have to travel 10 - 15hrs to Vancouver Temple and probably about the same to Edmonton Temple. The two stakes are geographically very remote. For myself - in the Grande Prairie Alberta Stake - for me to go to the Edmonton temple would be 7 hours and to go to Vancouver Temple would be about 15 hours on summer roads. Most people I know don't go to the temple more than once or twice a year for these reasons - especially with our 8 months of winter and mountain ranges.

With membership numbers no longer the only deciding factor on where gets a temple and President Nelson's want of people to be close to temples - I thought a Grande Prairie Alberta or Prince George British Columbia temple might be considered a possibility in the near future - especially for a mini temple like Helena Montana or Elko Nevada temples.

Anyone have thoughts about this?

James G. Stokes said...

Bransb1984, anything's possible. That being said, it is a comparatively "larger temple", which generally take longer to get government approvals than smaller ones. On the other hand, Japanese temples may more easily be approved than others. Currently, my projected groundbreaking window for that temple is mid-2027, but a number of temples that had renderings released last year had groundbreakings occur this year. It would logically follow, therefore, that a temple with a rendering released this year could, as a medium-sized temple where the Church is strong, may be more easily approved than others. So my advice: stay tuned.

James G. Stokes said...

One reason: the Church is just barely in the beginning stages of getting approval for the Victoria British Columbia Temple, and generally, the Church has not announced other temples in a Canadian province until after the most recently announced temple has seen construction begin. So it could be a couple of years (once the Victoria British Columbia Temple is in the construction queue) before one is announced in Prince George, which seems to be the most likely of the two you mentioned. I'd love to be wrong on that, but I don't think I am, unless I am overlooking something about Canadian temple announcements.

Noah said...

The sign posted on the site of the Osaka Japan Temple says:

Construction Period: early May 2026-late April 2027 (planned)

https://churchofjesuschristtemples.org/osaka-japan-temple/photographs/#Construction-1

Scooter said...

Super interesting podcast, thanks JTB!

James G. Stokes said...

I can't see construction of that temple in that size being completed in only 11 months at the current trending rates. Sounds more like the estimated construction start period to me. Are you sure your got the translation correct'?

Noah said...

The other sign on the site refers to demolition work being carried out between February 1, 2025 and April 30, 2026. Whether the demolition work has already started, I cannot confirm. If accurate, the groundbreaking ceremony would be held in May next year. Not even including demolition work, I too find it hard to imagine it will only take 11 months to construct, but that is what is printed on the construction notice.

Bryan Dorman said...

I made a current map of the USA with all the temples up by county as well as those counties that have at least one STAKE but no temple.

https://yapms.com/app?m=07h3h9pse5j663t

This is for the USA. My most likely predictions due to stake coverage in the USA are as follows:

Springville Utah
Richfield Utah
Menifee / Temecula California
Apache Junction Arizona
DFW Airport Texas (recent article about a temple-sized plot of land bought in Southlake for that purpose, unknown if it will be temple or chapel or both).
Jackson Mississippi (last of the Featherstone Temples)
Atlanta Georgia South (existing temple is on the north side of Atlanta)
Washington DC South (quite a few stakes on the VA side of the Potomac)
Portland Maine (three stakes in NH and three in ME).

Total in list: 9

Will work international areas next.

Durham Cleere said...

My top 20 temple predictions for this general conference:
1. Lahore, Pakistan
2. Tirana, Albania
3. Cardiff, Wales or Bristol, England
4. Port Harcourt, Nigeria
5. Ibadan, Nigeria
6. Bo, Sierra Leone
7. Lome, Togo
8. Luputa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
9. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
10. Lilongwe, Malawi
11. Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
12. Machala, Ecuador
13. Pisco, Peru
14. Tacna, Peru
15. Jackson, Mississippi
16. Augusta, Maine
17. Longview, Texas
18. Evanston, Wyoming
19. Rigby, Idaho
20. Roosevelt, Utah

Matt said...

I have deleted all irrelevant comments to this post. If this continues, I will not permit open committing on this blog and approve all comments before they are posted. Please keep comments relevant to the topic of Church growth. You can discuss other matters elsewhere.

StephenB said...

“Please keep comments relevant to the topic of Church growth”

Can we somehow make this a required checkmark when posting comments?

David McFadden said...

Where there's freedom, the church can thrive. Also, it's known as an American church so if the country is an ally of the US, the church can thrive.

David McFadden said...

Sorry I was out the last couple of weeks. for those that haven't seen it, here are my predictions. I've divided my predictions in 4 categories in this order:
-Top 20
-Somewhat Likely 40
-2nd group of 60
-3rd group of 60 (New category of predictions for this conference)

The miscellaneous category are not predicted location but rather locations I considered but didn't go with.

Not in any particular order, here are my top 20.
Madang Papua New Guinea
Angeles Philippines
Port Harcourt Nigeria
Benin/Togo
Bo Sierra Leone
Southern Spain
Neuquen/Trelew Argentina
Resistencia Argentina
Rio Branco Brazil
Tacna Peru
Quevedo Ecuador Temple
Poza Rica Mexico
Morelia Mexico
Charleston West Virginia
Mobile Alabama
Longview Texas
Evanston/Green River Wyoming
Wasatch Front Utah
Henderson Nevada
Arlington Washington

David McFadden said...

Here's the link:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?hl=en&mid=1G7hdBBWl07qNmfixCPEyCf7dAOKzzjw&ll=10.028608009536555%2C0&z=2

Daniel Moretti said...

Thank you for making this so clear. And so we reach the limit. We want to worship Jesus, not Trump, but the 'gringos' can't separate one from the other. If, to belong to this church, one must necessarily align oneself with this country and government and the predatory capitalism that the US disseminates, it is truly not a suitable place for me. I will not give my tithe to an institution whose members align themselves with far-right ideas, disguising these ideas under the guise of defending freedom. Thank you for making this clear to me.

Durham Cleere said...

Realized I forgot a few, so let's make it a top 25:
21. Olongapo, Philippines
22. Puerto Princesa, Philippines
23. Santa Maria, Brazil
24. Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
25. Hurricane, Utah

John said...

I haven't done any statistical analysis on this yet, but I've noticed a pattern when it comes to the number of stakes in a state or country, relative to the number of temples. I have to wonder if the number of temples would be better correlated to the square root of the number of stakes, rather than just the number of stakes. If you think about it, many temples still serve more than a handful of stakes, and are comparatively larger, in more concentrated areas.

Again, I haven't done any analysis yet. I just think it looks interesting.

samueljohnson55 said...

My list of temple predictions for this next conference:

Manchester, New Hampshire
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Tirana, Albania
Windhoek, Namibia
Bo, Sierra Leone
Cairo, Egypt
Angeles, Philippines
New Delhi, India
Jackson, Mississippi
Ottawa, Canada
Cardiff, Wales
Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
Charleston, West Virginia
Peru
Brazil
Evanston, Wyoming
Mexico
Ecuador
Argentina
Seville, Spain

A note about this list: I don't know specific cities in some of these so I left it blank. Cairo, Egypt is on here because I spoke Arabic on my mission and taught several native Egyptian Arabic-speaking people there a few years ago who got baptized and joined the church. This is obviously a very biased list, but nonetheless I think several of these are very likely to happen.

Downtownchrisbrown said...

I recently lived in Grande Prairie (5-6 years ago). The stake is small and the members are widely scattered over a very large area. I could see it happening one day, but a lot of growth would need to occur

David McFadden said...

I use a logarithmic function for driving time (over two hours) multiplied by the number and type of congregations (4 or less stakes) or number of stakes/districts (5+stakes). as well as a few other multipliers (ie. how well their grouped) and number of stakes currently in the temple district with account of size of temple. This is probably overkill as I don't think Salt Lake would use this formula, but the best I could gather. It's hard to determine temple attendance and other factors that could be used to determine need.

John Pack Lambert said...

At some level the places where temples are most needed is where the opportunity cost of attending the temple is so high that attendance is low. Well, there are two sets of needed temples. Ones needed because current use exceeds capacity. The other, because current availability is not enough for people to use the temple at ideal levels.

Since Church resources are finite, the goal is to build those temples in the latter category that are most needed first.

There are various ways to gage this, and Prezident Nelson has made it clear thst this is ultimately a matter of revelation. However we believe that perspiration often proceeds revelation.

Probably the best way to gage the potential demand that would be met if a temple was somewhere that the time, distance and other costs to get there were low enough is to know how many temple recommend holders there are in an area. We sometimes try to guess this info with the number of stakes and such, but those who actually make these decisions do have access yo that information to guide them.

It is interesting to make lists, but ultimately I trust President Nelson and the others involved in these decisions are guided by Jesus Christ on what to do. God's ways are not our ways, so temples that take a long time are not signs of misguided direction. Thry are a way God has chosen to bless us that might not be in the way we ourselves want.

Brett Stirling said...

I asked Grok to predict based on growth, traffic congestion and travel costs. This was its response.

**Predicted Locations (Top 5 Priorities, with Rationale)**:
1. **Togo (e.g., new temple in Lomé)**: 3 stakes, 28 congregations, 7,600+ members (0.08% concentration) in a 9M-pop. nation. Rapid 20% congregation growth in 2024; Lomé hosts all stakes. Congestion at 35% (TomTom, 40+ hours lost/year) in the capital worsens travel to Accra, Ghana (500+ km). Cross-reference: No temples in Togo; serves West Africa's emerging hub, reducing international burdens.

2. **Malaysia (e.g., new temple in Kuala Lumpur)**: 2+ stakes, 24 congregations, 11,000+ members (0.03% concentration) in 34M population. Stakes in KL area; growth steady since 2020. KL's 46% congestion (TomTom #20 globally, 80+ hours lost) ranks among world's worst, complicating trips to Singapore (1,000+ km). Cross-reference: No temples; Asia's top no-temple country by membership, aligning with Church's Pacific expansion.

3. **Zambia (e.g., new temple in Lusaka)**: 2+ stakes, 20+ congregations, 7,000+ members (0.04% concentration) in 20M nation. Stakes doubled since 2020; Lusaka-centered. 32% congestion (INRIX, 50 hours lost) in capital, with rising urban traffic, hinders access to Johannesburg (1,500+ km). Cross-reference: No temples; Africa's stake growth (10% global) prioritizes southern region.

4. **Benin (e.g., new temple in Cotonou)**: 1+ stake, 15+ congregations, 6,500+ members (0.05% concentration) in 14M population. Stake in Cotonou; 15% growth in units 2024. 38% congestion (port-driven, 45+ hours lost) exacerbates 600+ km to Abidjan, Ivory Coast. Cross-reference: No temples; neighbors temple countries but lacks local access, fitting West Africa equity push.

5. **Guyana (e.g., new temple in Georgetown)**: 1 stake, 12 congregations, 6,000+ members (0.75% concentration—highest here) in 0.8M nation. Georgetown stake; clustered density. 30%+ congestion (INRIX moderate, regional delays) compounds 2,000+ km to Barbados. Cross-reference: No temples; highest relative concentration signals priority for South American/Caribbean outlier.

**Other Likely Areas**: Sierra Leone (Freetown, 1 stake, 40%+ congestion); Liberia (Monrovia, 1 stake, 42% congestion); Papua New Guinea (Port Moresby, 1 stake, 35% congestion, remote from Australia). Unlikely: Very low-stake countries like Cambodia (1 stake, but negligible growth).

This focuses on untapped areas, supporting the Church's global equity (200+ temples announced under President Nelson). Monitor churchofjesuschrist.org/temples for updates.

Matt said...

Brett - I have tried using ChatGPT and other AI models for temple predictions, and they all fail horribly. They often include locations that already have temples or that are totally ridiculous. Although these can be useful for things, they are certainly not for this yet.

Hank said...

You have to heavily guide an LLM to get temple predictions that aren't in grand majority guesses at temples already announced. I did this several times and copilot just LOVES the idea of (brings up recurringly) temples in Scranton, PA; Tbilisi, Georgia; and Kathmandu, Nepal. Lahore and Yerevan are plausible first temples coming soon hopefully, similar to some of copilot's projections, but between Harrisburg and Summit New Jersey temple, nothing near Scranton is going to see a new temple anytime soon, unless the Hudson River, or New England are considered close to Scranton.

Hank said...

To add my personal predictions to the list: if I were a betting man, I would guess something like this.

-Resistencia, Argentina
-A second temple in Rio Grande do Sul (probably Santa Maria but it is a toss-up as to where)
-Neuquen, Argentina
-A third Eduadorean Temple, probably in Machala
-La Paz, Baja California Sur

-A second temple in Micronesia- probably Majuro, Marshall Islands
-Lahore, Pakistan
-Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast
-Port Harcourt, Nigeria
-Tirana, Albania

-Mobile, Alabama/Pensacola, Florida
-Kansas City II, Missouri-ish
-Tremonton, Utah
-SW, Wyoming/Morgan
-Juneau, Alaska

In case President Nelson goes past 15 (which I'm going to guess he will)
16. Lome or Cotonou
17. Poza Rica, Mexico
18. Tasmania, Australia
19. Bo, Sierra Leone
20. Temecula/Menifee-ish, CA

Hank said...

And my last note for now,
How do we count correct predictions? (guessing states or counties is maybe too easy)

Is it kosher if it is in the next municipality (US West) or metro area (other) over? Example, if I wrote Edinburgh, does the Glasgow temple announcement count as correct?

I might propose a next stake over standard (Glasgow would count for Edinburgh but Daejon not for Busan, or a driving time standard (10 mins Utah/Idaho, 30 US West, 1hr Rest) correctness standard?

We could also go a little looser and consider if the announced temple falls into (or draws from) the same current temple district as a prediction (any second temple in Rio Grande do Sul temple would count even if I wrote Pelotas and President Nelson says Passo Fundo.)

Disregarding the above semantics, I am of course very glad and grateful that we, as a church, get to participate in more temple ordinances and spend more time in the House of the Lord than ever before in relation to this construction. I travelled around Latin America last summer and also in my travels in the US, I have been amazed by the magnitude to which new temples are blessing Saints with shorter travel and more space to serve in the temple than ever before. It seems every temple district will soon or recently has split. Again, it is amazing to see.

Hank said...

That having been said, I would put my foot in my mouth if President Nelson were to announce a temple to be built at the Priesthood restoration site this conference.

Aaron Cornelius said...

Play it safe, my daughter predicted Glascow / Edinburgh. Needless to say she got it right!

Hank said...

Does anyone have strong, eye-witness-informed opinions on the specific placement of some of these and other predictions- as to where for some of these places a temple will be announced first? (Lahore/Islamabad, Cote d'Ivoire II, Mobile/Pensacola. SW WY/Morgan, Prince George/Grand Prairie, Ecuador III, Lome/Cotonou, Angeles/Olongapo, Southern Spain, Rigby/Blackfoot, Maine/NH, where in CDMX South)

Chris D. said...

Aside from the previously mentioned new Stake to be centered in Centerton Arkansas, and the rumored split of the Tarawa Kiribati West Stake, this Sunday.

Can anyone else predict any other planned new Stakes or Mergers for this Sunday? Asking for a friend.

Kelly Dean Hansen said...

From everything I've been able to find, resumption of construction at Bengaluru is extremely unlikely at this point. Legal obstacles appear insurmountable. Will it come to the point where the existing structure will need to be razed?

John Pack Lambert said...

Recently, In the last few months, a ward was transferred from my stake, the Bloomfield Hills Michigan Stake, to the Farmington Hills Michigan stake. This puts us to 5 wards, 3 branches and 2 groups. My branch is close to bring s ward, but I do not think we will be until at least next year at the earliest.

The Farmington Hills stake also gained the Clarkston Ward. That leaves the Grand Blanc stake at 6 wards, a branch and a group. Farmington Hills stake is at 7 wards, they were at 6 before. Westland stake got Livonia Ward, which means that Westland stake has 6 wards and a branch. Farmington Hills stake went from 1.5 square miles in Detroit to roughly 20, but it lost the 1.5 square miles it had.

Part of me has yo wonder if this is a prequel to splitting Toledo Stake by giving it the Monroe Ward and the Adrian Ward.

The resultant boundary of my stake leaves our stake center even further from anywhere close to the center of the stake. Even odder our stake is almost a U around the Farmington Hills Stake. For 5 miles east to west both the northern and southern boundaries of Southfield Ward are with our stake. There are areas just over 2 miles from our stake center not in the stake, yet it is just over 30 miles east to west and 26 miles north to south at the furthest expanse of our stake.

On the other hand Farmington Hills is no longer all in thst stake, since the part of it south/west of Grand River Avenue is not in the stake.

Livonia Ward does include a chunk of the City of Westland, the arra assigned to Livonia Public School for the most part, so the new boundaries but all Westland in the Westland Stake.

I am a bit surprised they did not adjust at least Southfield Ward boundaries in the process. About a third of that ward by area and maybe a higher percentage of active members live closer to our stake center than to the Southfield Chapel.

Kimberley in San Diego said...

Here is how I impress people with accurate temple predictions:
1) I make a list of where I think the next temples will be. Then I throw the list out because it is never right;
2) I go to this site and make a list based on what Matt and James say, and then modify it slightly based on what others are posting;
3) About 3 weeks before General Conference I start telling my friends where the new temples will be;
4) After Conference when people ask how I was able to predict so accurately I smile and make evasive comments about the importance of being in touch with the Spirit.

Sarah said...

I'm Australian and had to look up where Deer Park is, guarantee no one knows where that is, I'd just say 2nd Melbourne temple if I was you.

Sarah said...

Hi all, big nerd here, I'm a data analyst and have put together a document of various statistics/facts prior to the upcoming General Conference. Would love some feedback if you think it's valuable. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LGkHGO55l7T5F_yWLi0lvT_jkfoqHHWXlGQfJyrIpJo/edit?usp=sharing

Caleb said...

Moriba Town District in Sierra Leone certainly isn't slowing down in baptisms - another 131 were baptized there today, plus what looks to be at least another 100 throughout the Sierra Leone Bo Mission.

Michael Worley said...

Wow, the endowment sessions/week metric is really remarkable. I wonder if the population outside the United States is younger and less likely to attend the temple. Sacrament attendance is likely larger outside the United States than in it by now.

Downtownchrisbrown said...

I thought I would just take a look, but I found the information so compelling and interesting that I read the whole thing. Love the part about endowments per week and the part about the prophets near the end. Also like the art work. Well done!

JTB said...

That was exceptionally well done, thank you for sharing

Rodrigo Jofre said...

Thank you Sarah, this is beautiful. I loved your work.

Craig said...

Here is my Top 20 list of Temples for the upcoming General Conference.

01. Rigby, Idaho, USA
02. Cottonwood Heights, Holladay or Sandy, Utah, USA
03. Poza Rica or Papantla, Mexico
04. Ambato or Quevado, Ecuador
05. Chimbote, Peru
06. Sucre or Tarija, Bolivia
07. Neuquen, Argentina
08. Santa Maria, Brazil
09. Sorocaba, Brazil
10. Bo, Sierra Leone
11. Gagnoa, Daloa or Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast
12. Cotonou, Benin or Lome, Togo
13. Port Harcourt, Nigeria
14. Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
15. Kolwezi or Likasi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
16. Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
17. Taichung City, Taiwan
18. Angeles, Phillipines
19. Batangas, Phillipines
20. Marshall Islands

Craig H

Ryan Searcy said...

Noted. The map I was using does not seem to distinguish places very well, because I was under the impression neighborhoods were in ALL CAPS while cities were standard, and I thought Deer Park was its own city because of that. Looking it up, I now see it's a suburb of Melbourne, which makes me wonder how many of the places I listed are actual cities and not suburbs. I have modified this location to Melbourne (Deer Park) Australia. If a temple were announced for Melbourne it likely would first be announced as "Melbourne Australia West" similar to Brisbane's second as "Brisbane Australia South."

Johnathan Reese Whiting said...

@Kelly Dean Hansen

For my part, I'm going to pray and hope for miracles as far as Bengaluru is concerned.

Johnathan Reese Whiting said...

Thanks for sharing that temple doc, Sarah!

Colin said...

To the wonderful self confessed big nerd Sarah, I thank you for sharing your great work. Something else I would like to know that could show growth is how self suddicient, or to wht degree of sufficiency, is each country in supplying missionaries. Is it possible to have a break down of how many missionaries are called from each country? I would love to know how many they supply their for own missions, where they are assigned to from each country, what is the mix of countries of origin for each mission and how this istrending for each country. Any takers?

Joella92 said...

South Davis Utah
Charleston Sc
2nd in georgia
Dallas Area
Sandy Ut
idaho falls area
Central Coast Ca
Phoenix Area
San Franicso Ca
Weber County Ut
Herriman Ut
Seattle Area
West Valley Utah

Jonathon F. said...

Here are my top 30 predicted temple locations for October:

Corrientes/Resistencia Argentina
Neuquen Argentina
Tucumán Argentina
Araçatuba Brazil
Pelotas Brazil
Santa Maria Brazil area
Sorocaba Brazil
Los Ángeles Chile area
Daloa/Gagnoa/Yamoussoukro Côte d'Ivoire
Luputa Democratic Republic of the Congo
Machala Ecuador
Otavalo Ecuador
Quevedo Ecuador
Takoradi Ghana
Blackfoot Idaho
Lilongwe Malawi
Aguascalientes Mexico
Poza Rica Mexico
Saltillo Mexico
Ibadan Nigeria
Port Harcourt Nigeria
Chimbote Perú
Tacna Perú
Angeles Philippines
Bo Sierra Leone
Taichung Taiwan
Lomé Togo
Cottonwood Heights/Sandy Utah
Barcelona/Puerto La Cruz Venezuela
Evanston Wyoming

As usual, you can find my 'Next 50' and 'Less Likely' lists at this link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16fEj-5hfS38I50UUu_37kSZ9KyGRoukjeUBn-vwkcSo/edit?usp=sharing

David McFadden said...

November 23, there's a special combined stake conference between the Little Rock and North Little Rock Arkansas Stakes. Several rumors on why it might be which I'm only taking it as rumors. However a predominant rumor is a potential realignment of the LR & NLR stakes. NLR stake generally has stronger wards and fewer branches than LR Stake.

David McFadden said...

I noticed most prediction lists on this page heavily weighs locations outside of North America. Most of President Nelson's announcements have been within North America with nearly 3/4 of North America predictions being within the US.

Bryansb1984 said...

I heard Maryland got a new Branch the Annapolis YSA Branch and the Annapolis YSA Ward got renamed the Seven YSA Ward.

Chris D. said...

In the Washington DC YSA North Stake (2190370),

https://maps.churchofjesuschrist.org/stakes/2190370

there is both a, Annapolis YSA Branch (2155869), originally the Annapolis YSA Ward (2155869), and a newly organized, Severn YSA Ward (2308436), unknown date.

John Pack Lambert said...

One of my fellow temple workers told me many years he on occasion went to the Chicago Temple and was the only person in the session. I am not sure hethat worked pre-2023. So number of endowment sessions and attendance let alone potential attendance if there was a closer temple are not closely linked.

I have decided the recently boundary changes in my stake make an Ann Arbor Michigan Temple more likely but probabky not soon.

I also learned today that we will have 2 metro Detroit locations of the giving machine. It has come a long way since 2017 when there was just the one on temple Square.

BillC said...

Someone mentioned in Elder's Quorum this morning that he had heard that Pres. Nelson's goal is to have a Temple dedicated in every mission of the Church. I don't know if this is true or not, but it would be interesting to see how many missions do or do not have a Temple.

John Pack Lambert said...

First I think we would get to an equal number of temples as missions. I can see one temple per mission as a goal. A few like Vietnam may be a ways off.

Chris D. said...

Bill here is a Excel Spreadsheet i did years ago. i try to update it when a new site location is announced. you may find a few errors for the Temples in each Mission. But it is a good starting point.

Also, where there are multiple Temples within a mission boundary. I list them in alphabetical order.

https://1drv.ms/x/c/1db9589a4503c3cf/EV1pQRc9akpCvTWVL1BXCb0BBZn8LXQPWcS0ZBdB4cL8tA?e=9pkOnM

Chris D. said...

With the 18 Congregations between them, I could imagine 3 Stakes of 6 each.

Chris D. said...

Has anyone heard of any new Stakes this morning. The only 2 rumored ones were the new Centerton Arkansas and the possible split of the Tarawa Kiribati West Stake. Although not verified yet. We are far behind for a minimum of 10 this month to reach the desired goal of 100 new Stakes for first time since 2016. Last Sunday had Zero new Stakes or Districts.

Chris D. said...

Only members of the West stake facebook group can see the posts.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1326498004185702/about/

Caleb said...

No, but it appears the Tarawa Kiribati West Stake did split, and the new stake is the Tarawa Kiribati Betio Stake. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10236822580524996&set=pcb.10236822749209213

Chris D. said...

Here is the youtube recording of the West Conference

https://www.youtube.com/live/emn9km-pszg

Chris D. said...

The letter reading begins about 29 minutes into the video.

Sérgio Tourinho said...

Today, the Tubarão Brazil Stake has an interesting division. The Tubarão Stake has 7 wards and 2 branches. The stake was renamed the Criciúma Brazil Stake, with 5 wards, and the city of Tubarão, where the stake and stake center were located, became a district with 4 branches. Crisciúma Stake: Crisciúma 1st Ward Crisciúma 2nd Ward Crisciúma 3rd Ward Araranguá Ward Içara Ward Tubarão District: Oficinas Branch (formerly a ward) São João Branches (formerly a ward) Laguna Branch Imbituba Branch

Chris D. said...

If i understood the names correctly in the video, It appears that the following 4 wards and 2 branches were transferred to the new Betio Stake.

Betio 1st Ward (307580), Betio 2nd Ward (314188), Betio 3rd Ward (366234), Borotiam Branch (2158469), Tabontebike-Abaiang Branch (282553) and Temakin Ward (2188902).

With the following 5 Wards remaining with the West Stake.

Bairiki Ward (282529), Banraeaba Ward (2188899), Teaorareke 1st Ward (307521), Teaoraereke 2nd Ward (274291), and Tuarabu Ward (314412).

Sarah said...

Thank you for your kind words!

Sarah said...

Hi Colin, that would be very interesting data to have for sure, if anyone knows where to get it I could add it to my data model. I imagine it would be quite fluid though!

John Pack Lambert said...

With the balance of US verse no -US temples announced over the last few years, and the locations of new congregations and stakes, it does seem like we maynhave reach a point where we will see nord heavily non-US temple announcements.

The biggest issue is weather the large scale growth in especially East Africa can translate into additional announced temples.

Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, DR Congo all potentially could have additional temples announced. Benin, Togo, Malawi and Tanzania all might get their first temples. Togo or Benin seem the only truly likely. Although Malawi might be getting close. The cost and travel advantages to having a temple in country are huge, so I think Malawi might be higher priority than Bulawayo even though the later would serve twice as many stakes.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 286   Newer› Newest»