Introduction
Published online on December 19th, 2023, the article Mormons Are No Longer a Majority in Utah: Causes, Consequences, and Implications for the Sociology of Religion by Ryan T. Cragun, Bethany Gull, and Rick Phillips reports a recent study conducted to ascertain the percentage of members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the population of Utah. This is a significant study that highlights the discrepancy between Church-reported membership and the actual numbers of self-identified Latter-day Saints. Declining fertility in the Church, higher numbers of non-Latter-day Saints moving to Utah, and secularization were identified as factors that have contributed to the declining percentage of Latter-day Saints in Utah in recent decades.
It is important to note that the article does not focus on the member activity rates of Latter-day Saints in Utah, but instead focuses on self-affiliation among Latter-day Saints in Utah. Thus, there are individuals who may not self-affiliate as a Latter-day Saint who are reported on Church records as members. Furthermore, some self-affiliated Latter-day Saints are inactive (i.e., do not attend church). Nevertheless, self-affiliation is a useful metric to ascertain member activity rates. Similarly, member activity rates can also provide useful and accurate information regarding self-affiliation. However, these terms are not interchangable.
Self-Affiliation and Member Activity
The Cragun, Bull, and Phillips study concluded that 42% of the population of the State of Utah in 2022 self-identified as a Latter-day Saint. Member activity rates in Utah have generally averaged approximately 50% with significant variability depending on county and region in the state. For example, the Utah South Area had the highest sacrament meeting attendance in the worldwide Church in the year 2000 of more than 54% of total membership. Some stakes and wards in Utah today have member activity rates of 80-90% of total membership, whereas others may be as low as 20-30% of total membership. Overall, approximately 40% of Church-reported membership in the United States is active which I am defining as attending church on a regular basis (this activity rate estimate is based on thousands of surveys completed in the past 10 years from local members/leaders and returned missionaries). Assuming 50% of Church-reported membership in Utah is active (as member activity rates in Utah are higher than most states outside of Utah), then 32.1% of the population in the State of Utah would be active members. The Cragun, Bull, and Phillips study reported that 42% of the state population self-affiliate as Latter-days Saints. Therefore, Church-reported members who are inactive and who still self-affiliate as a Latter-day Saint would be approximately 10% of the state population, or 338,080 people. Therefore, three-quarters of self-affiliated Latter-day Saints would be estimated to be considered active, whereas one-quarter of self-affiliated Latter-day Saints would be estimated to be inactive. These data also indicate that 22% of the state population are on Church records as members but who are inactive and do not self-affiliate as Latter-day Saints. Therefore, approximately one-third of the population of the State of Utah are active Latter-day Saints, one-third of the state population are inactive Latter-day Saints (of whom approximately one-third still self-affiliate as a Latter-day Saint), and one-third of the state population are not Church members at all.
Trends on Growth
The population of the State of Utah increased from 1.72 million in 1990 to 3.38 million in 2022 per US census bureau statistics and estimates. Utah's population grew by 29.6% in the 1990s, 23.8% in the 2000s, and 18.4% in the 2010s. Church membership in Utah increased from 1.31 million as of year-end 1989 to 2.17 million as of year-end 2022. Therefore, the population of the State of Utah grew by 96.2% (1.66 million) between 1990 and 2022, whereas Church-reported membership for the State of Utah grew by 66.6% (868,560 members) between year-end 1989 and year-end 2022. In other words, for everyone one Latter-day Saint added in Utah there were approximately two non-Latter-day Saints added in Utah. Annual membership growth rates in Utah generally averaged around 2% for
most of the 1990s, 1.5-2.0% in the 2000s, 1-5% in the 2010s, and less
than 1% in the 2020s. By decade, Church membership in Utah grew by 23.0% in the 1990s, 17.4% in the 2000s, and 12.8% in the 2010s. It is important to note that the rate of growth for both Church membership and the state population has decelerated during the past three decades.
The number of congregations in Utah has increased every year since the Church began to publish the number of congregations in Utah in 1987 (except for 2011 when there was a significant realignment of young single adult [YSA] wards and student wards with the advent of YSA stakes). The rates for congregational growth have closely mirrored membership growth rates during the past 20 years. Consequently, the average number of Latter-day Saints per ward or branch in Utah has remained stable for the past 20 years at approximately 400 members. The number of stakes in Utah has also consistently increased year-over-year for the past several consecutive decades, indicating increasing numbers of active members, as both stakes and congregations require certain numbers of active members to operate and to create new congregations. Since 2000, the Church in Utah has reported a net increase of 7-8 stakes on average per year, with one year reporting a net increase of as few as 2 stakes (2012) whereas other years reporting a net increase of as many as 13 stakes (2000). In 2023, there have been seven stakes discontinued and 11 new stakes organized in Utah based on the most recent updates I have received on stake creations and consolidations for the year.
Have Latter-day Saints Ever Been a Majority in Utah?
I argue that active Latter-day Saints have been a minority in Utah for the entire past 100 years. If using a member activity rate of 50% since 1920, there has never been a year when active Latter-day Saints have constituted a majority of the population in the State of Utah (the highest year would have been 1987 when 39% of the population appeared to be active Latter-day Saints). If we were to assume that the rates of self-affiliation among all Church-reported members (which would be 66.6%) have been stable during the past 40 years, then the only years when this number was over 50% were from 1987-1993, with the highest percentage being in 1987 at 51.3%. However, it is probable that the rates of self-affiliation among inactive Latter-day Saints has decreased in recent decades, especially given rates of self-affiliation reported by other students cited in the Cragun, Bull, and Phillips article. For example, the American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS) estimated that 53% of population of the State of Utah were Mormon in 2001. The Cragun, Bull, and Phillips study assumes a linear decrease between 2001 and 2022, and this would therefore indicate that the percentage of self-affiliated Latter-day Saints in the Utah population fell below 50% in 2007.
Conclusion
Unfortunately, I am not aware of any studies that have exclusively assessed self-affiliation of Latter-day Saints with an appreciable sample size in the thousands of participants. Thus, the Cragun, Bull, and Phillips study provides a major contribution to ascertaining self-affiliation in Latter-day Saints through original research (we have generally had to rely upon government censuses for data on self-affiliation). It is a clear finding that the percentage of Latter-day Saints in Utah has steadily decreased. Per official Church records, the percentage of Latter-day Saints in Utah declined from 77.7% in 1987 (an all-time high for the percentage of Latter-day Saints in the past century) to 64.2% as of year-end 2022. Non-church sources have also reported a decline in the percentage of Latter-day Saints in Utah. Given increasing numbers of non-Latter-day Saints and inactive members, the Church has appeared to place a greater emphasis on missionary work in Utah through the assignment of larger numbers of full-time missionaries and the creation of new missions. In 1987, there were only two missions in Utah, whereas there were only five missions in Utah between 1999 and 2009. However, there have been 10 missions in Utah since 2015, with plans to organize three more missions in 2024. Thus, the Church has begun to treat Utah much more like any other state in the United States in regard to missionary efforts, albeit that Utah now stands out as having a disproportionate number of missions for its comparatively tiny population. For example, 13 of the Church's 120 missions in the United States that are anticipated to be operating by July 2024 will be in Utah (10.8%) even though the population of Utah constitutes a mere 1.0% of the population of the United States. In contrast, California is the most populous state in the United States with 39 million inhabitants (11.7% of the national population), and 13.3% (16) of the Church's 120 missions will be based in California. These efforts to concentrate a disproportionate amount of mission resources to Utah appears geared toward the reactivation of inactive members who appear to number more than one million and proselyte the more than one million people who are not on the records of the Church.
20 comments:
Reposting this comment from the previous post, since Matt published his new post just I as was commenting on the previous one (and I think this will be of interest to the larger group):
Just noticed that the Church recently completed the full translation of the Book of Mormon into Pohnpeian (https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm?lang=pon). It also looks like the Church started new Book of Mormon translations into the African languages of Chewa and Swati, the full translation of the Book of Mormon into Bengali, and a new Doctrine and Covenants translation in Nepali.
Altogether, the Church is currently actively working on at least 9 Book of Mormon translation efforts (Bengali, Chewa, Efik, Kazakh, Maltese, Sesotho and Swati, with re-translations of Arabic and Urdu), 5 Doctrine and Covenants translations (Burmese, Kinyarwanda, Navajo, Nepali, and Tok Pisin), and 2 Pearl of Great Price translations (Greek and Macedonian).
Here is a Church News update with details:
https://www.thechurchnews.com/living-faith/2023/12/31/24020386/book-of-mormon-translations-how-many-languages
My thanks once again to you all.
Great reporting and analysis, as usual.
I will add another reason for positing so many missions proportionately (or disproportionately) in Utah, which I did not see addressed. The number of converts generated from each Utah mission is formidable. I believe that the Utah missions usually have the highest baptizing rates in the country, and sometimes in the world.
This, to me, is a great sign or indicator, because if the organized religion and its peoples were more negative or clannish as many people I have heard of accusing Latter-Day Saints, especially in Utah, of being, then there would not be as many people joining and fellowshipping with the members. The Church does not have the best planning or execution of missionary efforts, as has been argued over the years, but resources and efforts do go, sooner or later, to where there is productive growth.
I think it is evident to see the growth surging in most of sub-Saharan Africa, and therefore more missions going forward there. Some missions in the world baptize in small numbers, like in much of Europe and parts of the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean.
It is great to see the steady growth in Latin America. The Book of Mormon promises of the descendants of Lehi will occur, more and more. How many are said of the remnants of Nephi and Lehi, Ephraim and Manasseh?
The positive growth in the Inter-Mountain West is always great to see. More converts translates to more missions. And of course, greater indicators of stakes and temples.
Great to see the spread of the Book of Mormon in more tongues and cultures.
We cannot stop this work, but we can help it spread.
One last thing about Utah: it has a disproportionate number of Latin American immigrants, if the numbers bear that out, and the combination of collective behavior and our faith and organization is a potent thing.
Same with Polynesians and some other cultures.
i notice they dont ask how many catholic in utah actally attend very biased
And they are having less children because of how much it cost .if you want alot of kids you have to move to the midwest or south
JoellaFaith, that is not necessarily true. President Nelson and his wife had 10 kids, as did President Packer. My uncle has lived in Utah since birth, and he has 8 children. I know of other families with 6 or more kids as well. There are numerous factors that impact the number of children Latter-day Saints have. For example, my wife and I have none because I was diagnosed as infertile. And I know of families in the midwest or south who don't have a large number of kids, so saying that "if you want a lot of kids, you have to move to the midwest or south" may be a faulty assessment.
That said, Matt, thanks for your assessment on the Salt Lake Tribune article. Your thorough analysis is always on point and appreciated.
Studies of religious activity can be inherently biased. Roman Catholic activity in Utah or anywhere else can be an interesting study. We could focus on Seventh Day Adventists, or Jehovah's Witnesses, mainline Protestants, Evangelicals, Muslims or others.
It seems the focus, scope, and concentration of this study was about membership and activity in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the dominant faith of this fast growing and dynamic movement. And, that is the focus of this blog, by the way.
I do not think it is trying to diminish or disrespect any other faith by doing so. Incidentally, as of the last 20 or more years there were only two U.S. states that had a majority religion. Utah, with some 60 some percent, and Rhode Island, with about 51 percent.
I am curious about rates of activity among Catholics and all religions. I, for one, do not go by one study to find out what the facts and implications of human populations are. We must look at dozens and likely hundreds of studies to get the best picture of our world, past, present, and future.
Happy New Year!!
Great analysis.
For years I've been frustrated with articles that try to say membership, self-affiliation, and activity rates as if they were the same thing. I've joined as a lifetime member of at least a handful of nonreligious organizations. Some I affiliate but don't attend and there maybe some I joined that I would no longer affiliate with.
As for 2023, with the new uniform standards for wards and stakes, it will be interesting to see what's the first stake outside the US and Canada to be created as they now have a higher bar to cross than before.
I wonder if that is the reason the 5th Harare and 3rd Bulawayo Zimbabwe Stakes that were planned for late 2023 have been delayed due to the new requirements?
My understanding is that any change approved pre-Jan. 1st was done under the old rules. So if something was actually approved before it can still be implemented if that is the case.
On the other hand if they were only submitted for and not approved it could be they would have been rejected under the old rules for issues not fully addressed before.
On thd whole I am hoping many more come unto Christ in Zimbabwe and that a Bulawayo Temple is announced this year. Luanda having a temple announced gives me hope for many more temples on the African continent.
Russell M Nelson and others had kids had kids starting in the 1950s when utah was much cheaper. And you knot having kids is the rare exmaple. Fact is if you live in a place like Missouri,iowa etc youre more likely to have more kids because you can afford the big house you will need and be able to arrord everything you need for the kids. In Utah most struggle for a couple in a 2 bedroom to get by and forget buying a house
Utah has a higher fertility rate than each of those states.
Joella - I agree with you. It's simple economics. The cost of living in Utah is much higher than the Midwest. That has to have a downward pressure on births in Utah over time (as the study shows).
But it seems that most on here haven't read the actual study, because it also captured respondents who were Catholics (and other faiths) in Utah as well. They found similar attrition rates of those who were Catholic at age 12 vs. now. In other words, roughly 1/3 had left the faith tradition they were raised in, of both Mormons and Catholics. The one exception were the "Nones" - if you are raised without religion, you're less likely to divert from that path later on, based on the survey.
The study also found that when people leave Mormonism they tend to become a "None" more relative to people who leave other religions. In other words, they are less likely to self-affiliate with some other Christian or world religion and are more likely to become agnostic/atheist/none, than those who leave Protestant Christianity or Catholicism.
Talking about fertility rates,
-Utah has consistently had the highest fertility rate until 2016 when South Dakota took the top spot.
-In 2019 North Dakota also surpassed Utah in fertility rate with all states not reaching the 2.1 needed for population replenishment.
-In 2020 Nebraska also surpassed Utah's fertility rate and with all of these states still surpassing Utah in 2021.
-These states aren't known to have high minority populations which tend to have higher fertility rates.
-Puerto Rico, a very Catholic territory and more economically deprived than all 50 states, has a fertility rate less than all 50 states and DC.
-2022 data is expected to be released at the end of the month.
A lot of factors outside of densification goes into fertility rates. The Philippines is one of the world's most densely populated countries in the world with Manila being the most densely populated city in the world. Yet it has one of the highest fertility rates outside of Africa and the Middle East.
Can anyone tell me from this Newsroom posy of the December 2023 New and Reorganized Stake Presidents, which Stake beginning with the letter A, was the President Alberto Quinteros called to? There was a typing error on the article
https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/new-stakes-and-stake-presidencies-announced-in-december-2023
San Miguel El Salvador Stake. President Quinteros is a counselor, not the president.
https://www.thechurchnews.com/callings/2023/12/31/24016991/read-about-these-18-new-stake-presidents-from-thailand-to-scotland
Thank you Jamie, I always appreciate the annual translation updates! Especially excited to hear that the full translation into Bengali has started.....
Ryan Cragun shortly after mission were a book on ins and outs of missionary work. I don’t know what his credentials were other than a know it all returned missionary. Then said a mission is to teach people that want to hear the gospel not people that believe something else. Doesn’t everyone missionaries teach believe something else? Did the Lord praise the Shakers for there sincerity?
He won’t compel us to accept his truth we have a right to worship how we choose. But the Lord does want all his children to join the church. Rails on missionaries bashing then he leaves the church and bashes anyone that believes in Gods
D. Korihor and hypocrite. Also told people that choose to leave stay true to your convictions. Like we can choose what is true amd what isn’t. Who believes anything he says?
James - In terms of the LDS becoming "Nones", it doesn't particularly surprise me, and it is tied to the "all or nothing" situation for the LDS Church. If a Baptist leaves the Church it may simply be because there is no Baptist church in the area, and there is a Methodist one that they like (or even marry into) and while they've left the Baptist Church, (no one is keeping track), they won't be viewed as having made anywhere the theological jump that someone who is LDS. Once someone decides that Joseph Smith *isn't* a prophet of God, ending up in a situation where they do believe in the Burning Bush or Noah's ark occurred is somewhat of a narrow "landing" strip situation. I would guess that you'd probably find similarly high rates of "ending up as nones" in other restorationist churches with "all or nothing" situations (and where they keep track) like the Jehovah's Witnesses.
Wow, Spencer, I sense your frustration and I appreciate the perspective. Loyalties can come and go with all of us. It is too bad when people turn away from what they once truly believed, but if people find another truth, they are free to turn on their former beliefs.
I remember all the missionary improvements that you referenced, and it is always striking when folks they know better than the Lord's Anointed. The question, or trick, or main factor is to really know who to trust.
I am grateful to believe in the way that I do, but I know many cannot see it that way.
Sad what happened recently in Liberia with the terrible explosion and fires. I hope some good comes from it, as many tragedies and sad events are followed by faith and miracles.
Any guesses or estimates as to how many stakes will be built this year, or districts turned to stakes? It is great to see the growth, and little attrition. Any new ones for the U.S. East Coast predicted or anticipated?
God bless, all.
As for US East Coast(ish) here is my forecast:
Likely:
1. Cincinnati, Ohio 6 Stakes in potential district
2. Mobile, AL 5 Stakes in potential district
Unlikely:
3. Charleston, WV 3 Stakes in potential district
4. Norfolk, VA 3 Stakes in potential district
5. Savannah, Georgia 3 Stakes in potential district
Post a Comment